• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

June

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

2017 Schumer says

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
02-09-2014, 04:06 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2013
325 posts
alexandernigth
0 AP
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) floated a compromise Sunday intended to break the stalemate on immigration reform on Capitol Hill. It was immediately rejected by House Republicans, but key advocates said it was an option worth considering.
The Gang of Eight leader’s plan: Pass a law this year, but don’t allow it to actually start taking place until 2017 – when President Barack Obama leaves office. That’s meant to target the heart of House GOP resistance to taking up immigration measures this year – that they simply don’t trust Obama to implement the law, particularly provisions on border security and interior enforcement.
Now I think that the rap against him — that he won’t enforce the law — is false,” Schumer said of Obama on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “He’s deported more people than any other president, but you could actually have the law start in 2017 without doing much violence to it.”
Though GOP complaints about the Obama administration and whether it will enforce any new laws have bubbled for months, those concerns took on new importance when Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said this week that it would be “difficult” to move forward on immigration until the president rebuilds that trust with House Republicans.
Boehner spokesman Michael Steel threw some cold water on Schumer’s proposal, calling it “entirely impractical.”
The suggestion “would totally eliminate the president’s incentive to enforce immigration law for the remainder of his term,” Steel said Sunday.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Schumer’s idea.
Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), who appeared on “Meet the Press” with Schumer, said he believed fellow Republicans could get on board with the New York Democrat’s idea. Portman voted against the Senate Gang of Eight legislation after failing to secure changes to the bill that would have bolstered workplace verification provisions.
“I think some Republicans would be interested in that, if we put in place the enforcement measures so that it would work,” the Ohio Republican said Sunday. “In other words, be sure the border is secure, be sure that you have a workforce enforcement program that works.”
The thinking behind Schumer’s plan is that even if current undocumented immigrants couldn’t become legalized until 2017, the administration could focus on deporting immigrants who have committed crimes or otherwise would not meet requirements to apply for legalization if such a law were in place.
Under this plan, the administration would also be able to spend more of its resources focusing on new immigrants trying to cross the border illegally. And under the current Senate Gang of Eight bill, undocumented immigrants who entered the United States after Dec. 31, 2011, do not qualify for legalization, but Schumer would propose to change that date to Dec. 31, 2013, to account for the delay in the law going into effect.
“They’ve already established they don’t trust the president to enforce the law on immigration, but he’s going to be the president through 2016 whether we pass a law or not,” Matt House, a spokesman for Schumer, said. “If they believe in immigration reform, why not get things moving for 2017?”
Ali Noorani, the executive director of the National Immigration Forum, said lawmakers should not reject Schumer’s proposal outright, noting that it would take a minimum of a year to 18 months anyway to write regulations and do other procedural steps to prepare for implementation of new immigration laws.
Schumer’s plan could also help redirect the resources now being spent on immigration enforcement to target real security threats to the United States, Noorani argued.
”The policy details will be tricky, but it would be crazy to ignore the option,” Noorani said in an email Sunday.
Frank Sharry, the executive director of pro-reform advocacy group America’s Voice, was also open to Schumer’s proposal.
“Schumer got us a huge bipartisan victory on immigration in the Senate by overcoming Republican objections and excuses,” Sharry said in an e-mail Sunday. “He’s bringing that same problem-solving mentality to the House Republicans. Let’s see if they really want to get it done or are hiding behind a lame excuse.”
On “Meet the Press,” Schumer also argued against trying to do immigration reform in 2015 or 2016, saying that the legislative debate would get tangled up in presidential primaries and pull lawmakers to the right — making a compromise between the parties more difficult. Several House Republicans, confident that their party will take control of the Senate in this fall’s midterm elections, have proposed waiting until 2015 to do immigration reform.
“Let’s say to our Republican colleagues, ‘You don’t trust Obama? Enact the law now, but put it into effect in 2017 and we can get something real done for America,”’ Schumer said.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/0...#ixzz2srDE3ui4
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
alexandernigth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to alexandernigth
Find all posts by alexandernigth
#2
02-09-2014, 04:37 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
856 posts
Severity
0 AP
Snap. Put them on the spotlight.
__________________
Mailing Method Certified
Date Received - 08/30/2012
i797c letter- 09/07/2012
Biometrics- 10/02/2012
Approved- 11/26/2012
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Severity
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Severity
Find all posts by Severity
#3
02-09-2014, 07:29 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
241 posts
Pluribus's Avatar
Pluribus
0 AP
Yeah, then say another Democrat wins the house if the GOP keep bullshitting America. The GOP will pout their cute little lips and throw another tantrum, and repeat what they just done now. "Our teabaggin', cash chucking overlords won't like that, America. There won't be an amnesty for them illegals. Sorry, try again in 50 years."
__________________

This I can't believe it's been two years.
On other news, the word "shit" is okay to say on television. The word "republican" has been added to the curse words list.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pluribus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pluribus
Find all posts by Pluribus
#4
02-09-2014, 07:34 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,652 posts
dado123 online
0 AP
At least his offering a solution to the Republicans, but for sure the Boehner will prop say something stupid in reply to Schumer's suggestion.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dado123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dado123
Find all posts by dado123
#5
02-09-2014, 10:15 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
856 posts
Severity
0 AP
I'm interested in Obamas opinion to the idea.
__________________
Mailing Method Certified
Date Received - 08/30/2012
i797c letter- 09/07/2012
Biometrics- 10/02/2012
Approved- 11/26/2012
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Severity
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Severity
Find all posts by Severity
#6
02-09-2014, 10:57 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2009
520 posts
bigdreamer2010
0 AP
I lol'd at the article. Senator Schumer is such a troll lol. Good one...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
bigdreamer2010
View Public Profile
Send a private message to bigdreamer2010
Find all posts by bigdreamer2010
#7
02-10-2014, 12:40 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
5,710 posts
IamAman's Avatar
IamAman
0 AP
Chuck is awesome. He just wants to call the Republican bluff and make them look stupider than they are.
__________________
Late 40's Dreamer (Holy Fucking shit I'm almost 50 and still dealing with this), aged out of original DACA and didn't have a chance to apply for extended DACA after Republicans killed it on the vine.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IamAman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IamAman
Find all posts by IamAman
#8
02-10-2014, 06:05 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2010
200 posts
sabzon
0 AP
lol, basically saying "don't trust Obama? It's ok then, trust yourselves"

fatality.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
sabzon
View Public Profile
Send a private message to sabzon
Find all posts by sabzon


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.