• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

April

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

House passes bill to undo Obama's immigration actions

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
01-14-2015, 07:46 PM
Senior Member
From PA
Joined in May 2012
936 posts
Rev_Scholar's Avatar
Rev_Scholar
0 AP
House just passed a bill that would undo both the recent executive action for parents and our DACA! Why do they hate us so much?

http://news.yahoo.com/house-takes-br...-politics.html

Quote:
WASHINGTON (AP) — Shunning a White House veto threat and opposition within their own party, House Republicans approved legislation Wednesday to overturn President Barack Obama's key immigration policies and expose hundreds of thousands of younger immigrants to expulsion from the U.S.

Boehner: House will fund Homeland Security, block Obama on immigration Reuters
U.S. House passes security funding bill blocking immigration actions Reuters
The 236-191 vote came on a broad bill that would provide $39.7 billion to finance the Homeland Security Department through the rest of the budget year, legislation that lawmakers of both parties said was sorely needed to pay for counterterrorism, cybersecurity and other priorities at a moment when the Paris terror attacks have underscored dire threats.

Democrats accused Republicans of putting that money at risk by attaching veto-bait amendments on immigration, and some Republicans voiced the same concern. But House GOP leaders and most of their rank and file accused Obama in turn of reckless and unconstitutional actions on immigration that had to be answered.

"This executive overreach is an affront to the rule of law and to the Constitution itself," said House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio. "The people made clear that they wanted more accountability from this president, and by our votes here today we will heed their will and we will keep our oath to protect and defend the Constitution."

But Rep. Linda Sanchez, D-Calif., who chairs the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, said the Republicans were simply pandering to the far right.

"Shame on Republicans for attacking the Latino community," Sanchez said. "Republicans are consciously targeting millions of families who work hard, contribute to our communities and are just trying to give their children a chance at the American dream."

View galleryRep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., a leading advocate in …
Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., a leading advocate in the House for comprehensive immigration reform, l …
One of the immigration amendments, approved 237-190, would undo executive actions that Obama announced in November to provide temporary deportation relief and work permits to some 4 million immigrants in the country illegally, mostly people who have children who are citizens or legal permanent residents. The amendment also would cancel earlier directives to immigration agents aimed at giving them discretion in focusing deportations on criminals.

A second amendment would delete Obama's 2012 policy that's granted work permits and stays of deportation to more than 600,000 immigrants who arrived in the U.S. illegally as children under age 16. That measure passed narrowly, 218-209, as 26 of the more moderate Republicans, some representing large Hispanic populations, joined Democrats in opposition.

The underlying bill passed on a mostly party line vote, with 10 Republicans voting "no" and two Democrats voting "yes."

But even with Republicans in control of the Senate, the bill faces tough sledding there. Republicans are six votes shy of the 60-vote majority needed to advance most legislation, and some GOP senators have argued that the Homeland Security bill shouldn't be the vehicle for a contentious debate on immigration.

Within the House GOP, too, there's frustration from some centrist lawmakers that two weeks into a new session of Congress, with a bigger party majority in the House, the most conservative lawmakers are still calling the shots, successfully pushing leaders for a vote to undo the 2012 policy dealing with younger immigrants known as "Dreamers."

"If we were just specifically dealing with the November overreach of the president, you'd have Democrats who'd be voting with us on that piece of it but we've gone well beyond that," said Rep. Jeff Denham, R-Calif. "We're passing a bill for political reasons, a bill that has no ability to pass the Senate."

Before leaving town for a two-day retreat in Hershey, Pennsylvania, Republicans also steered the House to approval of legislation to ease the landmark Dodd-Frank law, which aimed to rein in banks and Wall Street. The new legislation would give U.S. banks two extra years to ensure that their holdings of certain complex and risky securities don't put them out of compliance with a new banking rule. The Dodd-Frank changes, approved 271-154, also face an Obama veto threat.

Given the growing importance of Latino voters, Wednesday's immigration votes could end up raising questions in the 2016 presidential election for the eventual GOP nominee. Potential candidates weren't touching the issue Wednesday. Requests for comments from former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and former GOP nominee Mitt Romney went unanswered. At an event in Manchester, New Hampshire, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky refused to say if he would back his House colleagues' efforts.

Democrats, on the other hand, were eager to weigh in.

Rep. Luis Gutierrez of Illinois warned Republicans they were igniting "the mobilization of an immigrant community throughout this nation that will be the death knell to the future of your party."

Wednesday's votes were set in motion late last year, after Obama infuriated Republicans by announcing executive moves on immigration not long after the GOP swept the midterm elections. Republicans passed full-year spending bills for most of the government but kept the Homeland Security Department on a short leash in order to revisit the issue when they would be in full control of Congress.

Yet given Obama's veto pen and Senate rules granting significant rights to the minority party, it's not clear that the GOP has much more leverage now than it did before. House and Senate Republican leaders have ruled out a government shutdown or any disruption to Homeland Security funding, so it appears likely that once the House bill is rejected by the Senate or vetoed by the president, the House will have to accept a version with less contentious language on immigration.

Current Homeland Security funding expires at the end of February, so House leaders have given themselves more than a month to find a solution. It's expected to be a topic of debate at the Hershey retreat.
__________________
"It is better to have a fair intellect that is well used than a powerful one that is idle."
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Rev_Scholar
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Rev_Scholar
Find all posts by Rev_Scholar
#2
01-14-2015, 08:30 PM
Member
Joined in Dec 2014
33 posts
userfriendly2580
0 AP
I honestly don't understand how any of the representatives voting for this think. I sent my congressmen quite the email after I read about this asking for his reasoning on voting for such a ridiculous bill.
__________________
Renewal received 8/19 - Bio done 9/10 - Expired 12/30 - Approved 1/8/15
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
userfriendly2580
View Public Profile
Send a private message to userfriendly2580
Find all posts by userfriendly2580
#3
01-14-2015, 09:52 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2012
374 posts
theguywitheyes's Avatar
theguywitheyes
0 AP
My God....What's going to happen next? Is the bill going to be sent to the Senate for voting?

Wa....how far will the stupid republicans go to destroy Obama's actions?
__________________
Application date: 5/12/16
biometric: 6/20/16
Approval: 10/13/2016
Expiration: 9/4/2016
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
theguywitheyes
View Public Profile
Send a private message to theguywitheyes
Find all posts by theguywitheyes
#4
01-14-2015, 10:38 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
It is going nowhere. The bill is dead in the Senate even if considered.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#5
01-14-2015, 11:24 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2012
374 posts
theguywitheyes's Avatar
theguywitheyes
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ianus View Post
It is going nowhere. The bill is dead in the Senate even if considered.
How can you be so certain?
__________________
Application date: 5/12/16
biometric: 6/20/16
Approval: 10/13/2016
Expiration: 9/4/2016
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
theguywitheyes
View Public Profile
Send a private message to theguywitheyes
Find all posts by theguywitheyes
#6
01-15-2015, 12:33 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2012
190 posts
Inception's Avatar
Inception
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by theguywitheyes View Post
How can you be so certain?
I believe he is certain because the republicans need 6 democrat or independent votes to reach 60 and that is unlikely to happen and even if they do manage to get them, the president will veto this absurd bill.
__________________
Sent Package to Lewisville,TX on 08/20 Notice date:8/24 Bio Appt 09/27
Nebraska.
Ead approval : 11/16
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Inception
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Inception
Find all posts by Inception
#7
01-15-2015, 06:19 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2014
108 posts
isual's Avatar
isual
0 AP
President's going to veto it; checks and balances guys.

But the same thing can work against the president as well.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
isual
View Public Profile
Send a private message to isual
Find all posts by isual
#8
01-15-2015, 07:01 PM
Junior Member
From Illinois
Joined in Jan 2015
9 posts
pau.rz07
0 AP
To answer the question as to why they hate us so much is because alot of republicans along with (some) democrats are extremely ill informed on the subject. I mean half of the threads that are about immigration on news websites have comments where people think we are getting free housing, welfare, free tuition and free health insurance!?

They believe that we just apply and right away we are granted our EAD's.
I mean most of them think that what we are getting is citizenship! It's crazy how so many people open their mouths and think that their opinions are facts. I don't even like reading commen sections in news forums anymore...

All we can do is hope for the best!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
pau.rz07
View Public Profile
Send a private message to pau.rz07
Find all posts by pau.rz07
#9
01-21-2015, 12:55 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
What we need to do is educate those around us who CAN vote
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.