• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

June

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Immigration Case on Track for 2016 Supreme Court Ruling

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›
#1
12-02-2015, 12:30 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
5,711 posts
IamAman's Avatar
IamAman
0 AP
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/ar...iling-deadline

This kind of gives a preview of the timing:
January - Court will decide to take the case or not - very important
February - clerks and lawyers get their shit together and prepare the case
Late April is the hearing
Late June is the decision.


Quote:
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected Texas’s request for a 30-day extension to file its opening brief on President Barack Obama’s deferred-deportation program, in a move that leaves open the possibility the high court will rule on the plan next year.
The justices gave Texas an eight-day delay, heeding calls from the Obama administration to keep the case on track for a potential decision by the end of the court’s term in June. The administration is seeking review after a federal appeals court blocked the program.
Under the court’s normal scheduling practices, a 30-day delay would have prevented consideration of the case until the court’s next term starts in October 2016. The court gave no explanation for the decision, and there were no recorded dissents.
The administration’s program would shield as many as 5 million undocumented immigrants from deportation and let them obtain work permits and some public benefits. The plan, which was announced by Obama a year ago but hasn’t taken effect, applies to people whose children are either U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents and who meet other requirements.
The case takes on added significance as the 2016 presidential campaign is under way and Republican candidates routinely criticize Obama’s immigration policy.
A federal appeals court ruled 2-1 that Obama was overstepping his authority.
The administration’s appeal argues that Texas and 25 other states lack the legal right to challenge the program. Justice Department lawyers also contend that past Supreme Court cases afford the president broad discretion to set deportation priorities. Texas plans to ask the Supreme Court to reject the Obama administration’s appeal without a hearing.
Obama’s top Supreme Court lawyer, Solicitor General Donald Verrilli, urged the justices to limit the extension to eight days to ensure the case could be heard in the current term.
A delay would “prolong for an additional year the disruption of federal immigration policy,” Verrilli told the court in a letter Tuesday. He said that if the court were to grant the full extension, he would ask for a rare May argument session.
In his request for more time, Texas Solicitor General Scott Keller cited workload, saying the states’ lawyers had “numerous pressing deadlines” in other cases. Keller didn’t directly address the prospect that an extension might push the case into the 2016-17 term, though he said the administration could have sought a stay of the lower court ruling.
The administration filed its petition on Nov. 20, making Dec. 21 the original due date for the Texas response. Parties often request an extension of time to file and the court grants most of those requests as a matter of course.
The timing of the immigration case made it unusual. The court typically adds the last cases of the term in January, when the nine justices have three private conferences scheduled to consider bids for review. The last of those meetings takes place Jan. 22, and the justices aren’t scheduled to meet again until Feb. 19. The last scheduled arguments are in late April.
The case is United States v. Texas, 15-674.
__________________
Late 40's Dreamer (Holy Fucking shit I'm almost 50 and still dealing with this), aged out of original DACA and didn't have a chance to apply for extended DACA after Republicans killed it on the vine.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IamAman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IamAman
Find all posts by IamAman
#2
12-02-2015, 03:49 PM
BANNED
Joined in Feb 2015
2,064 posts
DACA-IR-DA
0 AP
Great.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DACA-IR-DA
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DACA-IR-DA
#3
12-04-2015, 02:08 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
551 posts
pink
0 AP
yasssss!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
pink
View Public Profile
Send a private message to pink
Find all posts by pink
#4
12-04-2015, 03:39 PM
Senior Member
From Los Angeles
Joined in Jan 2007
1,044 posts
drvenom's Avatar
drvenom
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by pink View Post
yasssss!
Damn, I'm keeping my fingers crossed that this will be it. I'm getting old.
__________________
Year arrived and age at time of arrival: 1989, 8
Education level: Two Master's (Econ and Math); Can't afford a PhD.
DACA: I was too old by 5 days.
Expanded Daca: I should be good now.
Bitter? Optimistic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
drvenom
View Public Profile
Send a private message to drvenom
Find all posts by drvenom
#5
12-04-2015, 04:24 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
5,711 posts
IamAman's Avatar
IamAman
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by drvenom View Post
Damn, I'm keeping my fingers crossed that this will be it. I'm getting old.
lol I AM old
__________________
Late 40's Dreamer (Holy Fucking shit I'm almost 50 and still dealing with this), aged out of original DACA and didn't have a chance to apply for extended DACA after Republicans killed it on the vine.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IamAman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IamAman
Find all posts by IamAman
#6
12-04-2015, 04:36 PM
Senior Member
From Los Angeles
Joined in Jan 2007
1,044 posts
drvenom's Avatar
drvenom
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamAman View Post
lol I AM old
I'm right behind you man. I'm 34 now and my good looks are fading.
__________________
Year arrived and age at time of arrival: 1989, 8
Education level: Two Master's (Econ and Math); Can't afford a PhD.
DACA: I was too old by 5 days.
Expanded Daca: I should be good now.
Bitter? Optimistic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
drvenom
View Public Profile
Send a private message to drvenom
Find all posts by drvenom
#7
12-04-2015, 04:58 PM
Senior Member
From FL
Joined in Jun 2011
3,590 posts
Dres2011's Avatar
Dres2011
0 AP
I really hope this is it. I'm getting old as fuck too
__________________
Expiration: 08/05/2019
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Dres2011
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Dres2011
Find all posts by Dres2011
#8
12-04-2015, 06:04 PM
Senior Member
From Los Angeles
Joined in Jan 2007
1,044 posts
drvenom's Avatar
drvenom
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dres2011 View Post
I really hope this is it. I'm getting old as fuck too
But don't you already have DACA?
__________________
Year arrived and age at time of arrival: 1989, 8
Education level: Two Master's (Econ and Math); Can't afford a PhD.
DACA: I was too old by 5 days.
Expanded Daca: I should be good now.
Bitter? Optimistic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
drvenom
View Public Profile
Send a private message to drvenom
Find all posts by drvenom
#9
12-04-2015, 06:40 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by drvenom View Post
But don't you already have DACA?
yeah this.....
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#10
12-04-2015, 08:31 PM
Senior Member
From FL
Joined in Jun 2011
3,590 posts
Dres2011's Avatar
Dres2011
0 AP
What we really need are green cards... Too many jumping through hoops to get anything with daca.
__________________
Expiration: 08/05/2019
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Dres2011
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Dres2011
Find all posts by Dres2011
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.