• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Miami-Dade abandons "sanctuary" status one day after Trump's crackdown

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
01-27-2017, 12:49 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
937 posts
tf2legend
0 AP
One day after President Donald Trump’s executive order threatening to cut federal dollars from cities and counties that don’t fully comply with federal immigration enforcement officials, the first so-called “sanctuary” has reversed course: Miami-Dade County.

Fearing a loss of millions of dollars from the federal government, Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Gimenez ordered county jails to begin complying with federal immigration detention demands. The move effectively unravels Miami-Dade’s status as a “sanctuary” for the undocumented.


“Sanctuaries” are jurisdictions that do not assist federal immigration enforcement officials by keeping individuals in custody beyond their release date so they can be “picked up” by immigration enforcement.

“In light of the provisions of the Executive Order, I direct you and your staff to honor all immigration detainer requests received from the Department of Homeland Security,” the Republican mayor wrote in a brief memo on Thursday to the interim director of Miami-Dade’s corrections and rehabilitation department, according to The Miami Herald.

Since 2013, Miami-Dade has declined to indefinitely detain inmates wanted by federal immigration enforcement. Unlike other cities, like San Francisco, that policy was not framed in principle. Rather, it was tied to the fact that federal authorities would not reimburse the county for the expense of keeping individuals in custody. Miami-Dade has resisted being characterized as a “sanctuary,” The Miami Herald notes.

Speaking to The Miami Herald, Mayor Gimenez put the shift in stark financial terms. Last year, Miami-Dade declined to continue detaining approximately 100 undocumented inmates wanted by federal immigration. Keeping them would have cost $52,000, The Miami Herald reported. In contrast, Miami-Dade is set to receive $355 million in federal funds in 2017, the newspaper noted.

“I want to make sure we don’t put in jeopardy the millions of funds we get from the federal government for a $52,000 issue,” Mayor Gimenez told The Miami Herald. “It doesn’t mean that we’re going to be arresting more people. It doesn’t mean that we’re going to be enforcing any immigration laws.”

President Trump took to Twitter to celebrate the mayor’s decision:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/miami-ch...mps-crackdown/
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
tf2legend
View Public Profile
Send a private message to tf2legend
Find all posts by tf2legend
#2
01-27-2017, 12:55 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
5,411 posts
JohannBernoulli1667's Avatar
JohannBernoulli1667
0 AP
That was quick.


Only places like California and maybe New York will be able to take this.

Our cities are broke, even places like Chicago will succumb to the pressure, there is just no money left. The crooks in Washington took it all.
__________________
"The world is my country, science my religion"- Constantine Huygens
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
JohannBernoulli1667
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JohannBernoulli1667
Find all posts by JohannBernoulli1667
#3
01-27-2017, 12:57 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
1,674 posts
dreamer12345
0 AP
dis foo Cuban?

spineless prick
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamer12345
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamer12345
Find all posts by dreamer12345
#4
01-27-2017, 12:59 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2016
3,631 posts
eva02's Avatar
eva02
0 AP
So one day in jail will lead to our deportation unless the city is a sanctuary city?
__________________
Expiration: 04/09/2020
Renewal Accepted: 02/05/2019
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
eva02
View Public Profile
Send a private message to eva02
Find all posts by eva02
#5
01-27-2017, 01:01 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2016
3,631 posts
eva02's Avatar
eva02
0 AP
How are they going to assure that the multitude of cites are compliant? Are they just targeting big cities?
__________________
Expiration: 04/09/2020
Renewal Accepted: 02/05/2019
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
eva02
View Public Profile
Send a private message to eva02
Find all posts by eva02
#6
01-27-2017, 01:03 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
5,411 posts
JohannBernoulli1667's Avatar
JohannBernoulli1667
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by eva02 View Post
So one day in jail will lead to our deportation unless the city is a sanctuary city?
That is the idea yes...

My parents for example live in the Suburbs of Chicago.

Might be a good idea for them to move within the city limits.
__________________
"The world is my country, science my religion"- Constantine Huygens
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
JohannBernoulli1667
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JohannBernoulli1667
Find all posts by JohannBernoulli1667
#7
01-27-2017, 01:22 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2014
4,804 posts
2MoreYears's Avatar
2MoreYears
0 AP
won't bring back wet foot dry foot policy.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2MoreYears
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2MoreYears
Find all posts by 2MoreYears
#8
01-27-2017, 07:20 AM
Junior Member
Joined in Mar 2015
19 posts
amilcar96
0 AP
Lol there goes my city
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
amilcar96
View Public Profile
Send a private message to amilcar96
Find all posts by amilcar96
#9
01-27-2017, 07:30 AM
BANNED
Joined in Jan 2017
113 posts
Sudo
0 AP
I'm not surprised. Republican States (Miami is in a Republican state) depends on Federal funding because people there don't pay much taxes.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Sudo
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Sudo
#10
01-27-2017, 11:18 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2013
848 posts
FLDreamerrr
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sudo View Post
I'm not surprised. Republican States (Miami is in a Republican state) depends on Federal funding because people there don't pay much taxes.
Miami is pretty liberal actually . Florida as a state itself is a swing state , this year repubs won but not by a large margin like usual . South Florida is really liberal where most of north and central Florida is mostly republican so
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
FLDreamerrr
View Public Profile
Send a private message to FLDreamerrr
Find all posts by FLDreamerrr
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.