• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

January

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Second Circuit Grants Trump's Stay in discovery in Pair of DACA Suits

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
10-20-2017, 04:31 PM
Moderator
Joined in Mar 2006
6,460 posts
Swim19's Avatar
Swim19
190 AP
Quote:
The federal government was awarded an emergency stay in discovery proceedings by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Friday, as it prepares to file a writ of mandamus in a pair of suits over President Donald Trump’s decision, announced last month in an executive order, to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program last month.


The order in In Re: Elaine Duke 17-3345 was issued by Circuit Judge José Cabranes, ahead of a three-judge panel's consideration of the as-of-yet unfiled mandamus request. The government has until Monday afternoon to file papers.


The move by the U.S. Department of Justice is the latest in a series of pushbacks against a pair of lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The plaintiffs—a private individual, Martin Jonathan Batalla Vidal in Batalla Vidal v. Baran, 16-cv-04756, and a host of state attorneys general, led by New York AG Eric Schneiderman in State of New York v. Trump, 17-cv-05228—have moved forward with discovery in the parallel suits, overseen by U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis and Magistrate Judge James Orenstein.


Even as the government sought a stay from the appellate court Thursday, Orenstein and Garaufis, in separate orders the same day, pushed discovery forward in the suits.
http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=...20170920162733
__________________
Initial Approval: 11/13/12
1st Renewal: 10-7-14
2nd Renewal: 10/12/16
3rd Renewal: 5/16/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Swim19
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Swim19
Find all posts by Swim19
#2
10-20-2017, 04:43 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2010
814 posts
PhelonOne87's Avatar
PhelonOne87
0 AP
English please lol what's this all mean
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
PhelonOne87
View Public Profile
Send a private message to PhelonOne87
Find all posts by PhelonOne87
#3
10-20-2017, 05:07 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2014
4,811 posts
2MoreYears's Avatar
2MoreYears
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhelonOne87 View Post
English please lol what's this all mean
I have no idea either but doesn't sound good .
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2MoreYears
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2MoreYears
Find all posts by 2MoreYears
#4
10-20-2017, 05:38 PM
Moderator
Joined in Mar 2006
6,460 posts
Swim19's Avatar
Swim19
190 AP
I'm not sure either, and it's not allowing me to read the full article.
__________________
Initial Approval: 11/13/12
1st Renewal: 10-7-14
2nd Renewal: 10/12/16
3rd Renewal: 5/16/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Swim19
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Swim19
Find all posts by Swim19
#5
10-20-2017, 05:44 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
383 posts
complicatedc33
0 AP
A wild guess would be that the judge is letting the DACA termination stand at the moment, and they might be waiting on more evidence from the administration.

Maybe it was an injunctive relief lawsuit, and the are not lifting the DACA termination to provide relief right now?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
complicatedc33
View Public Profile
Send a private message to complicatedc33
Find all posts by complicatedc33
#6
10-20-2017, 08:06 PM
Senior Member
From Minnesota
Joined in Nov 2009
6,004 posts
Demise's Avatar
Demise
0 AP
Discovery is the process of getting relevant documentation from the other side. A stay here basically means that they don't have to fork them over, yet.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Demise
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Demise
Find all posts by Demise
#7
10-20-2017, 08:35 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
1,478 posts
dreamer__13's Avatar
dreamer__13
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demise View Post
Discovery is the process of getting relevant documentation from the other side. A stay here basically means that they don't have to fork them over, yet.
Yea it seems like they won’t have to turn things over by the 27th as originally requested.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamer__13
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamer__13
Find all posts by dreamer__13
#8
10-20-2017, 08:43 PM
Moderator
Joined in Mar 2006
6,460 posts
Swim19's Avatar
Swim19
190 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamer__13 View Post
Yea it seems like they won’t have to turn things over by the 27th as originally requested.
That's what I thought, and this means a delay in the lawsuit unfortunately.
__________________
Initial Approval: 11/13/12
1st Renewal: 10-7-14
2nd Renewal: 10/12/16
3rd Renewal: 5/16/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Swim19
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Swim19
Find all posts by Swim19
#9
10-20-2017, 10:04 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2017
423 posts
Adrian2145's Avatar
Adrian2145
0 AP
Means the federal court is putting and stay and won’t let the other two courts decide.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Adrian2145
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Adrian2145
Find all posts by Adrian2145
#10
10-21-2017, 08:49 AM
Moderator
Joined in Mar 2006
6,460 posts
Swim19's Avatar
Swim19
190 AP
Some more info on this:

Quote:
Judge Jose A. Cabranes of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan on Friday temporarily suspended lower court rulings related to record production
.
A three-judge panel of the appeals court will now get involved in determining how much information the Trump administration has to turn over about how it decided to end the DACA program.
http://www.nydailynews.com/newswires...icle-1.3577518
__________________
Initial Approval: 11/13/12
1st Renewal: 10-7-14
2nd Renewal: 10/12/16
3rd Renewal: 5/16/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Swim19
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Swim19
Find all posts by Swim19
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.