• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

April

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Lawmakers call on Trump to drop bid for legal immigration cuts

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
01-28-2018, 11:30 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
629 posts
desice's Avatar
desice
0 AP
Quote:
Lawmakers in both parties said Sunday that the immigration debate should focus narrowly on efforts to legalize young immigrants known as "dreamers" and beef up border security, suggesting that President Trump's demands to slash legal immigration levels are likely to sink a deal.

Democrats have voiced fierce opposition to a White House plan, released late last week, that featured a path to citizenship for 1.8 million dreamers in exchange for $25 billion for his border wall and sharp cuts to family immigration visas.

Though Democratic leaders have grudgingly offered wall funding, they have accused the president of leveraging the dreamers as "ransom" to severely constrict legal immigration, calling it a wish list for "anti-immigration hard-liners" and "white supremacists."

Congress members, including some Republicans, said Sunday that the negotiations have gone too far afield ahead of a March 5 deadline after which 690,000 dreamers in an Obama-era deferred action program could begin to lose their protections from deportation.

"It seems to me that the two important things to tackle right now . . . are to protect the dreamers and also to strengthen border security," Sen. Susan Collins, a moderate Republican from Maine, said on CBS's "Face the Nation."

She called Trump's proposals to reform legal immigration "very important" but also "very complicated."

Appearing after Collins on the same show, Reps. Will Hurd (R-Tx.) and Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) — who have proposed a House bill to provide legal status to dreamers and bolster border security — agreed that addressing the legal immigration system in the negotiations over dreamers is implausible.

"I still believe that a narrow bill is most important; the thing that we can get through our Congress, both houses, in the House and in the Senate," said Hurd, who represents a district with more than 800 miles of border with Mexico. "Because the more things you add, you start creating coalitions of opposition. And so let's keep this narrow."

White House officials rejected suggestions that the president was asking for too much. In rolling out his plan last week, aides called the citizenship path for dreamers a potential lure for additional illegal immigration and said the proposed border security increases — including more immigration agents and judges — would help prevent it.

They said the curbs to family immigration — which Trump and other conservatives have referred to as "chain migration" — would help offset a surge in legalized immigrants represented by the dreamers, who have been in the country since they were children.


White House legislative director Marc Short said Sunday that Trump was willing to incur some criticism from his hard-right base by supporting the dreamers in order to reform the immigration system.

"We feel that is certainly worth it if we can help to fix this problem once and for all, which is the other parts of the proposal the president has put forward," Short said on "Fox News Sunday." Referring to the Senate and House Democratic leaders, Short added: "The question is, are Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi going to provide cover for their members from the radical left-leaning base? So far, they are not showing the same leadership."

Congressional efforts at comprehensive immigration reform failed under presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama. In 2013, the Senate approved bipartisan legislation that would have offered a path to citizenship for the nation's 11 million undocumented immigrants, build or renovate 700 miles of border fencing and enact significant changes to family immigration and work visa programs — but the GOP-controlled House did not allow a vote on that bill.

Negotiators from both parties said after meeting with Trump at the White House two weeks ago that they had agreed to narrow the talks to four categories — the future of the dreamers, border security, cuts to family immigration and the diversity visa lottery, which Trump wants to eliminate.

Trump's plan would terminate the ability of U.S. citizens to apply for green cards, awarding permanent legal residence, for their parents and siblings. The nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute estimated that the proposal could annually drop the number of green cards by at least 288,000 — 36 percent of the total number last year.

In a private meeting with a smaller bipartisan group, Trump reportedly used a vulgar word to describe Haiti, El Salvador and African countries and asked aloud why the United States could not have more immigrants from countries like Norway — sparking widespread outrage and prompting calls from immigrant rights groups for Democrats to hold a harder line in the talks.

"It's offensive for a number of reasons just on pure policy," Greg Chen, director of government relations for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said of the president's bid to slash family immigration. "It takes us back generations, to a time of far more restrictive immigration at the turn of the 20th century. It disregards the in*cred*ibly positive impact immigration has had on the country in terms of economic and social benefits."

He noted that the family immigration programs, implemented in 1965, initially favored those from European countries but have since evolved to cover more immigrants from Asia and Latin America.

"It's striking that now the administration wants to entertain a whole litany of topics that amounts to comprehensive reform," Chen said. "What is likely to get done in this environment is something much more limited."
Source: https://washingtonpost.com/politics/...dd2_story.html
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
desice
View Public Profile
Send a private message to desice
Find all posts by desice
#2
01-28-2018, 11:39 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
549 posts
Alfredo93's Avatar
Alfredo93
0 AP
Reasonable! Lets hope Cryin' Chuck Schumer doesnt try to sneak in TPS this time!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Alfredo93
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Alfredo93
Find all posts by Alfredo93
#3
01-28-2018, 11:40 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2012
1,118 posts
kyungwc
20 AP
Let's make it happen captain
__________________
Initial DACA Approval: 10/25/12
7th Renewal Approval: 8/16/24
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
kyungwc
View Public Profile
Send a private message to kyungwc
Find all posts by kyungwc
#4
01-28-2018, 11:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
0 AP
Good. I like this reaction better than rejecting the framework altogether.

If nothing happens, Canada here I come.
__________________
#Lawgic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
#5
01-28-2018, 11:58 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
1,479 posts
ceaguila
0 AP
I'm sure, the senate will pass its own version with enough bi-partisan support with end to DV, Border secuirity and money for wall. The problem will be the house and if Trump can be convinced to get behind it.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
ceaguila
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ceaguila
Find all posts by ceaguila
#6
01-29-2018, 12:01 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2018
147 posts
Stunner310
0 AP
I’m also not trying to be shady But let’s hope Durbin doesn’t throw 3 year working permits for parents when this administration is clearly trying to do away with chain migration . Don’t get me wrong it’s fucked up I know but to be real honest as others have said here if we can at least get residency and eventually citizenship we can actually help our parents vs if you don’t help our parents let’s just fucken throw the deal off and we’re all fucked
__________________
Current DACA/EAD Expires: 08/08/2018
Renewal Request Sent: 01/17/2018
Renewal Received 1/19/2018
Renewal Accepted 1/22/2018 Biometrics Appointment: ?
Renewal Granted: ? - EAD Shipped: ? - EAD Received: ?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Stunner310
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Stunner310
Find all posts by Stunner310
#7
01-29-2018, 12:01 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2017
4,996 posts
libertarian1776's Avatar
libertarian1776
0 AP
the deal will get more narrower each time we get closer to march 5th.

Dem's will concede to just 1.8 mil DACA legalization and GOP will concede on Border Security only.

they will leave the rest for Phase 2 CIR.
__________________
initial DACA: 6/2012
2nd renewal: 9/2014
3rd renewal: 11/2016
4th renewal: 11/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
libertarian1776
View Public Profile
Send a private message to libertarian1776
Find all posts by libertarian1776
#8
01-29-2018, 12:08 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2017
423 posts
Adrian2145's Avatar
Adrian2145
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by libertarian1776 View Post
nah it wont, with your attitude nothing will happen. we will all be deported on march 5th.
It’s not up to me, it’s not my attitude that will get me legalized, so yeah my renewal will get approved and I’ll take whatever happens head-on.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Adrian2145
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Adrian2145
Find all posts by Adrian2145
#9
01-29-2018, 12:10 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2017
4,996 posts
libertarian1776's Avatar
libertarian1776
0 AP
actually it is your attitude and outlook in life that will get you legalized, if you depend so much on government and waiting for something to happen then nothing will truly will happen for u.

as you said nothing will happen, so find a USC wife, get work sponsorship, move to a country that will accept your credentials.

no fate but what we make. peoples attitude say alot what your outlook is in life.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adrian2145 View Post
It’s not up to me, it’s not my attitude that will get me legalized, so yeah my renewal will get approved and I’ll take whatever happens head-on.
__________________
initial DACA: 6/2012
2nd renewal: 9/2014
3rd renewal: 11/2016
4th renewal: 11/2018
Last edited by libertarian1776; 01-29-2018 at 12:15 AM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
libertarian1776
View Public Profile
Send a private message to libertarian1776
Find all posts by libertarian1776
#10
01-29-2018, 12:12 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2018
147 posts
Stunner310
0 AP
For those who haven’t seen this it’s comedy called Russell Brand destroys the legal immigration debate

https://www.facebook.com/4biddenKnow...47302442111421
__________________
Current DACA/EAD Expires: 08/08/2018
Renewal Request Sent: 01/17/2018
Renewal Received 1/19/2018
Renewal Accepted 1/22/2018 Biometrics Appointment: ?
Renewal Granted: ? - EAD Shipped: ? - EAD Received: ?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Stunner310
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Stunner310
Find all posts by Stunner310
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.