• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

ACLU: Federal agencies setting 'trap' to deport immigrants

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
08-14-2018, 11:36 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
510 posts
pavpatel
pavpatel
View Public Profile
Send a private message to pavpatel
Find all posts by pavpatel
0 AP
Quote:
Federal immigration agencies have launched a coordinated campaign to arrest and deport immigrants seeking to become legal U.S. residents through marriage, according to documents released this week in a class-action lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union.

The documents, which include depositions and correspondence from federal officials, show the extent to which officials for the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services have been coordinating with their counterparts at Immigration and Customs Enforcement to facilitate arrests at citizenship offices in New England.

The ACLU, in its arguments, criticizes the efforts as a deportation "trap" that violates the constitutional rights of immigrants otherwise following the rules to become legal residents.

"The government created this path for them to seek a green card," Matthew Segal, legal director for the ACLU of Massachusetts, said in an interview Tuesday. "The government can't create that path and then arrest folks for following that path."

An ICE spokesman responded that allegations of "inappropriate coordination" between the two agencies are "unfounded."

"This routine coordination within the Department of Homeland Security, not unlike the cooperative efforts we maintain with many other federal partners, is lawful and legitimate," John Mohan said by email. A spokesman for USCIS said the agency doesn't comment on pending litigation.

The ACLU lawsuit argues that Homeland Security regulations created under former President Barack Obama allow immigrants with U.S.-citizen spouses to stay in the country while they seek a green card — even if they're already subject to deportation.

"That regulation is still the law of the land," Segal said Tuesday. "So arresting these folks is not about law and order. These are people with a path to legalization and the government is trying to block that."

The federal government, in seeking to dismiss the lawsuit, argues in part that federal District Court has no jurisdiction in the matter.

The ACLU's more than 250-page legal brief includes emails between ICE officials outlining how it coordinates arrests with USCIS in New England.

Andrew Graham, a Boston-based ICE officer, said the agency generally receives from USCIS lists of immigrants seeking legal residency who have already been ordered for deportation, had re-entered the country illegally or were considered "an egregious criminal alien."

Graham said ICE then works with USCIS to schedule interviews so that ICE agents can be present to make an arrest. He noted ICE prefers to spread out the interviews to ease the workload on its agents and to prevent generating "negative media interest" from the arrests.

"(A)t the end of the day we are in the removal business and it's our job to locate and arrest them," Graham wrote in part.

The ACLU's legal brief is the latest in the class-action suit filed earlier this year on behalf of immigrants who have been or fear being separated from their U.S.-citizen spouses.

The case will be argued Aug. 20 in Boston federal court and names five couples, including lead plaintiffs Lilian Calderon and Luis Gordillo, of Rhode Island.

Gordillo is a U.S. citizen, but Calderon is a native of Guatemala who came to the country with her family at the age of 3. She was ordered to leave in 2002 after her father was denied asylum.

The 30-year-old mother of two was detained by ICE in January after she and her husband attended an interview at the USCIS office in Johnston, Rhode Island, to confirm their marriage.

Calderon was released in February after the ACLU challenged the detention.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/aclu-fede...154406668.html



How are we supposed to go and change our status? This was my only hope. Now what?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#2
08-14-2018, 11:49 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2016
4,636 posts
DogJuiceMan's Avatar
DogJuiceMan
DogJuiceMan
View Public Profile
Send a private message to DogJuiceMan
Find all posts by DogJuiceMan
0 AP
Yer screwed mate. And so am I apparently. This just raises the stakes.
__________________
Concept of 彁
Slump of slumps. Clusterfuck of clusterfucks.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#3
08-15-2018, 05:36 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
yeah this is pretty mess up, so we seriously better not lose our DACA doing dumb GOT_DACA shit
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
Last edited by Pianoswithoutfaith; 08-15-2018 at 02:10 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#4
08-15-2018, 09:06 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
742 posts
NotADreamerPerSe
NotADreamerPerSe
View Public Profile
Send a private message to NotADreamerPerSe
Find all posts by NotADreamerPerSe
0 AP
The blows to the immigrant community just keep on coming.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#5
08-15-2018, 09:42 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2017
232 posts
VIK
VIK
View Public Profile
Send a private message to VIK
Find all posts by VIK
0 AP
His base is super happy over it.
Fucking Hypocrites!


First they say become legal, now this is good. If you are he illegally you have to go.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#6
08-15-2018, 10:00 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2015
4,866 posts
Got_Daca's Avatar
Got_Daca
Got_Daca
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Got_Daca
Find all posts by Got_Daca
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianoswithoutfaith View Post
yeah this is pretty mess up, so we seriously better not lose your DACA doing dumb GOT_DACA shit
I am still on DACA

Jokes on you
__________________
MAGA DACA ACA FAM
Approved: 11/27/2023
U-Visa eligible (not applied yet)
"Dreamers can't take the center stage"
- Democratic Leadership
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#7
08-15-2018, 01:02 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
510 posts
pavpatel
pavpatel
View Public Profile
Send a private message to pavpatel
Find all posts by pavpatel
0 AP
Well they can't touch us if we have DACA right?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#8
08-15-2018, 04:11 PM
BANNED
Joined in Feb 2015
2,064 posts
DACA-IR-DA
DACA-IR-DA
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DACA-IR-DA
0 AP
Why apply when not qualified?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#9
08-15-2018, 04:31 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
195 posts
AztecAztec
AztecAztec
View Public Profile
Send a private message to AztecAztec
Find all posts by AztecAztec
0 AP
Quote:
The ACLU lawsuit argues that Homeland Security regulations created under former President Barack Obama allow immigrants with U.S.-citizen spouses to stay in the country while they seek a green card — even if they're already subject to deportation.
What regulation stopped deportation orders if you were getting married ?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#10
08-15-2018, 05:36 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
783 posts
justjohnjustice1988's Avatar
justjohnjustice1988
justjohnjustice1988
View Public Profile
Send a private message to justjohnjustice1988
Find all posts by justjohnjustice1988
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DACA-IR-DA View Post
Why apply when not qualified?
Exactly.

This doesn't apply to people that dont have criminal records.

This is fear mongering from the Left.

Next article please lol
__________________
Filing/APP sent: myself/08-18-12 1:00 p.m. Received: 08-21-12 G-1145 Notification: 08-24-12 5:12 p.m.I-797 C Letter: 8-29-12 Bio Appt.: 9-24-12 RFE notice: 11-06-12 (online) 11-10-12 (letter) RFE resp. to USCIS: 11-13-12
EAD in hands:Nov 20!!!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.