• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Biden: Senate filibuster change on debt a ‘real possibility’

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
10-05-2021, 09:20 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2018
651 posts
cmeow
0 AP
source: https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden...af043ac2617cc6

Quote:
To get around Republican obstruction, President Joe Biden said Tuesday that Democrats are considering a change to the Senate’s filibuster rules in order to quickly approve lifting the nation’s debt limit and avoid what would be a devastating credit default.

The president’s surprise remarks come as the Senate is tangled in a fiscally dangerous standoff over a vote that’s needed to suspend the nation’s debt limit and allow the federal government to continue borrowing to pay down its balances. Congress has just days to act before the Oct. 18 deadline when the Treasury Department has warned it will run short of funds to handle the nation’s already accrued debt load.

...

The topic was broached during a private Democratic Senate lunch session Tuesday as senators were growing exasperated with Republican Leader Mitch McConnell’s refusal to allow a simple vote on the debt limit. Instead, McConnell is forcing Democrats to undertake what they view as a cumbersome process taking days, if not weeks, that will eat into their agenda.

With Republicans putting up hurdles to the vote, Democratic senators have been discussing a range of options — including a carve-out to the chamber’s filibuster rules.

But invoking a filibuster rules change seems highly unlikely, in part because all Democratic senators would need to be on board.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
cmeow
View Public Profile
Send a private message to cmeow
Find all posts by cmeow
#2
10-05-2021, 09:27 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2017
2,722 posts
Copper's Avatar
Copper
0 AP
At this point no one should care about this bill considering the fact that we are on the back burner again.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Copper
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Copper
Find all posts by Copper
#3
10-05-2021, 09:55 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2006
3,100 posts
VJB2's Avatar
VJB2
0 AP
I always find things like this a little amusing because … Manchin.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
VJB2
View Public Profile
Send a private message to VJB2
Find all posts by VJB2
#4
10-05-2021, 10:18 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2013
391 posts
leo86
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Copper View Post
At this point no one should care about this bill considering the fact that we are on the back burner again.
Agreed. I don't care anymore. We're not getting anything out of this so why care about it?

I'm done with following Politics for awhile. This sh*t is nuking my mental health.
__________________
Application Received: 5/28/13

Biometrics: Done
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
leo86
View Public Profile
Send a private message to leo86
Find all posts by leo86
#5
10-05-2021, 11:13 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2012
271 posts
moto's Avatar
moto
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Copper View Post
At this point no one should care about this bill considering the fact that we are on the back burner again.
Gotta agree. Looks like we are effectively squeezed out of reconciliation. Might as well cheer for sinema and manchin to doom the whole ship. We probably won’t get shit in benefits but end up contributing in higher taxes
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
moto
View Public Profile
Send a private message to moto
Find all posts by moto
#6
10-05-2021, 11:24 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2018
651 posts
cmeow
0 AP
Removing the filibuster means any bill only requires 50 votes to pass. That includes immigration and does not need to be in reconciliation where it has to follow the Byrd rule.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
cmeow
View Public Profile
Send a private message to cmeow
Find all posts by cmeow
#7
10-05-2021, 11:36 PM
Senior Member
From Virginia
Joined in Aug 2012
2,329 posts
Malign0n's Avatar
Malign0n
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmeow View Post
Removing the filibuster means any bill only requires 50 votes to pass. That includes immigration and does not need to be in reconciliation where it has to follow the Byrd rule.
The problem is that they’re considering a carve out in the filibuster for the debt ceiling. Everything else subject to 60 votes
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Malign0n
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Malign0n
Find all posts by Malign0n
#8
10-05-2021, 11:39 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2012
271 posts
moto's Avatar
moto
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmeow View Post
Removing the filibuster means any bill only requires 50 votes to pass. That includes immigration and does not need to be in reconciliation where it has to follow the Byrd rule.
I would say higher chances of reconciliation passing as it is rather than democrats ending filibuster. These kinda news is just for giggles
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
moto
View Public Profile
Send a private message to moto
Find all posts by moto
#9
10-06-2021, 12:11 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
1,674 posts
dreamer12345
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by VJB2 View Post
I always find things like this a little amusing because … Manchin.
eh...not that easy. Joe's kind of calling turtle's bluff. The carveout would obviously be for the debt ceiling and nothing else, and neither Manchin nor Sinema would have a reason to oppose it unless they just want to blatantly say "I am w/the GOP and will not help in ruining turtle's plan".
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamer12345
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamer12345
Find all posts by dreamer12345
#10
10-06-2021, 10:55 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2015
1,103 posts
Afridi786
0 AP
Smart move by the turtle. Dems will blink and carve out filibuster for debt limit, and few years down the line GOP will use this as an excuse to get rid of the entire filibuster next time they have power and accomplish their priorities including getting rid of us. I hate the lying, incompetent, and corrupt Dems.
__________________
4th Renewal - Sent: 9/21/19, Expiring: 8/19/20, Approved: 03/23/20
Final Renewal Attempt? - Sent: 5/20/20, Expiring: 3/22/22
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Afridi786
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Afridi786
Find all posts by Afridi786
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.