• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

August

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Democrats get hopeful sign from parliamentarian on immigration

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›
  • last »
#1
11-23-2021, 09:06 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2006
3,106 posts
VJB2's Avatar
VJB2
0 AP
I won't be satisfied until the complete bill is on Biden's desk with immigration benefits, but here's something:

Quote:
Democrats got a hopeful sign from the Senate rules referee Tuesday in their effort to include provisions for undocumented immigrants in the $1.75 trillion "human" infrastructure bill they hope to pass through the partisan reconciliation process.

Driving the news: The Senate parliamentarian met with Democratic staff about the immigration provisions and did not rule out their inclusion in President Biden's Build Back Better agenda, sources familiar with the meeting told Axios.

The provisions in question would allow millions of undocumented immigrants to apply for work permits, permission to travel and to receive temporary protection from deportation.

The official ruling is expected in the coming weeks, although no date is yet set, the sources said.

Why it matters: Democrats have promised to pursue immigration reform through the legislation that's also focused on expanding the social safety net and addressing climate change.

Their two previous proposals were turned away by the Senate parliamentarian.
Two people familiar with discussions described the outcome of Tuesday's meeting as a positive sign.

The Senate Parliamentarian did not accept, reject or recommend changes to the proposal — only moving it along to a formal test of budgetary effects in which both parties will be able to make their case to the parliamentarian.

Flashback: The two previous plans rejected by the Senate parliamentarian offered legal permanent residency.

Plan A — A proposal to provided as many as 8 million undocumented immigrants a pathway to citizenship was rejected in an official “Byrd Bath," a vet to see if it has a budgetary effect and, therefore, can be included in a reconciliation bill.

Plan B — A move to update an outdated immigration registry to provide green cards for some undocumented immigrants was rejected during another review.

The parliamentarian later called it a “weighty policy change” not budgetary in nature.
Source
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
VJB2
View Public Profile
Send a private message to VJB2
Find all posts by VJB2
#2
11-23-2021, 09:18 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
444 posts
Hallowpoint1911
0 AP
Let us hope this gets approved.
__________________
-Never Trust a Politician
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Hallowpoint1911
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Hallowpoint1911
Find all posts by Hallowpoint1911
#3
11-23-2021, 11:14 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
1,500 posts
Outsider626's Avatar
Outsider626
0 AP
Same DACA only for 5 years (x2). And an excuse for Dems to kick the can down the road for another 10 years.

Travel option is the same Advance Parole that we currently have. You will not be able to travel freely.

I rather reapply for Daca every 2 years than this.

DACA will never die regardless.
Last edited by Outsider626; 11-23-2021 at 11:22 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Outsider626
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Outsider626
Find all posts by Outsider626
#4
11-23-2021, 11:18 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
1,674 posts
dreamer12345
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outsider626 View Post
Same DACA only for 5 years (x2). And an excuse for Dems to kick the can down the road for another 10 years.

I rather reapply for Daca every 2 years than this.

DACA will never die regardless.
dems are perpetual losers. If her majesty the Parlamentarian is fine w/this, she'd have been fine w/dream act, and if she wasn't, 80% of the electorate would be yelling "off w/her head".
Last edited by dreamer12345; 11-23-2021 at 11:25 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamer12345
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamer12345
Find all posts by dreamer12345
#5
11-23-2021, 11:28 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,110 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
Get rid of the filibuster save voters' rights and path to citizenship.

Happy Thanksgiving!!

Stay safe.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#6
11-24-2021, 01:27 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2018
1,241 posts
hDreamer1988
0 AP
If this passes, it creates a necessity in congress to renew every 10 years. IF close to 7 million people enter get permits, enter the workforce, and contribute; it becomes too big to fail or to end. Ending a program like that and essentially forcing millions out of the workforce would decimate the economy to the point it may not recover by the next election cycle. DACA or TPS is too small to really have lasting impacts.... but 7MM would give us safety in numbers.

A lot of the GOP haters would say Republicans won't care but they really would. You would see a major market crash and that would cost them millions in their personal investments.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
hDreamer1988
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hDreamer1988
Find all posts by hDreamer1988
#7
11-24-2021, 07:56 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2009
520 posts
bigdreamer2010
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by hDreamer1988 View Post
If this passes, it creates a necessity in congress to renew every 10 years. IF close to 7 million people enter get permits, enter the workforce, and contribute; it becomes too big to fail or to end. Ending a program like that and essentially forcing millions out of the workforce would decimate the economy to the point it may not recover by the next election cycle. DACA or TPS is too small to really have lasting impacts.... but 7MM would give us safety in numbers.

A lot of the GOP haters would say Republicans won't care but they really would. You would see a major market crash and that would cost them millions in their personal investments.
^He gets it.

It’s not what we wanted but it’s decent. It’ll help out a lot of ppl. Work authorization and a drivers license will change lives.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
bigdreamer2010
View Public Profile
Send a private message to bigdreamer2010
Find all posts by bigdreamer2010
#8
11-24-2021, 08:52 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
371 posts
davidrellis
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outsider626 View Post
Same DACA only for 5 years (x2). And an excuse for Dems to kick the can down the road for another 10 years.

Travel option is the same Advance Parole that we currently have. You will not be able to travel freely.

I rather reapply for Daca every 2 years than this.

DACA will never die regardless.
How do you know is the same as advance parole?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
davidrellis
View Public Profile
Send a private message to davidrellis
Find all posts by davidrellis
#9
11-24-2021, 11:30 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2010
339 posts
NK74
0 AP
The unofficial meeting with the parliamentian is a pretty important step because if anything, the legislators get a good idea -if not an explicit one- of what the parliamentarian will approve.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
NK74
View Public Profile
Send a private message to NK74
Find all posts by NK74
#10
11-24-2021, 12:09 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2007
1,617 posts
frbc13's Avatar
frbc13
0 AP
1 time renewable 5 year permit for MLK day 2021?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
frbc13
View Public Profile
Send a private message to frbc13
Find all posts by frbc13
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›
  • last »


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.