• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

June

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

5TH Court decision is in

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›
  • last »
#1
10-05-2022, 05:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
317 posts
Imthexman's Avatar
Imthexman
0 AP
As I predicted, the 5th court allowed DACA to continue.


DACA forever!

https://twitter.com/SuzanneMonyak/st...66107552911361
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Imthexman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Imthexman
Find all posts by Imthexman
#2
10-05-2022, 05:10 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2014
4,798 posts
2MoreYears's Avatar
2MoreYears
0 AP
Well that's better than I expected, actually idk really. That means a permanent solution isn't happening anytime soon.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2MoreYears
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2MoreYears
Find all posts by 2MoreYears
#3
10-05-2022, 05:13 PM
Member
Joined in Dec 2010
37 posts
dauser
0 AP
So what does this mean? Can the lower court do anything?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dauser
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dauser
Find all posts by dauser
#4
10-05-2022, 05:14 PM
Member
Joined in Oct 2007
51 posts
ntwpa
0 AP
What does that mean though? Are we still going to be judged in the Supreme Court?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
ntwpa
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ntwpa
Find all posts by ntwpa
#5
10-05-2022, 05:20 PM
Senior Member
From South Florida
Joined in May 2008
2,283 posts
ECW
260 AP
Source??
__________________
APPLICATION RECEIVED: 9-19-2012
I-797C RECEIVED: 9-26-2012
BIOMETRICS LETTER RECEIVED: 9-27-2012 for 10-16-2012
Walk-In Done: 10-2-2012
EAD/DACA Approve: 12-7-2012
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
ECW
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ECW
Find all posts by ECW
#6
10-05-2022, 05:23 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
317 posts
Imthexman's Avatar
Imthexman
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntwpa View Post
What does that mean though? Are we still going to be judged in the Supreme Court?
This means that the 5th circuit agreed with the lower court judge (Hanen) who said to stop accepting new applications but to keep DACA alive lol.

5th circuit court wants nothing to do with it and sent it back to Hanen for further consideration, Hanen is a p*ssy and is not going to end DACA, otherwise he would have done it already, so he is going to keep his original ruling and so DACA stays as is with no new applications allowed.

As I wrote before the 5th Circuit is becoming more immigrant friendly with all the decisions they have taken in the last year i.e. (Niz-Chavez)
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Imthexman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Imthexman
Find all posts by Imthexman
#7
10-05-2022, 05:28 PM
Member
Joined in Dec 2010
37 posts
dauser
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imthexman View Post
This means that the 5th circuit agreed with the lower court judge (Hanen) who said to stop accepting new applications but to keep DACA alive lol.

5th circuit court wants nothing to do with it and sent it back to Hanen for further consideration, Hanen is a p*ssy and is not going to end DACA, otherwise he would have done it already, so he is going to keep his original ruling and so DACA stays as is with no new applications allowed.

As I wrote before the 5th Circuit is becoming more immigrant friendly with all the decisions they have taken in the last year i.e. (Niz-Chavez)

so it wont reach the supreme court?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dauser
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dauser
Find all posts by dauser
#8
10-05-2022, 05:29 PM
Member
Joined in Oct 2007
51 posts
ntwpa
0 AP
Omg thank you for the explanation I was still freaking out being not able to understand what that meant
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
ntwpa
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ntwpa
Find all posts by ntwpa
#9
10-05-2022, 05:32 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2017
304 posts
DACAgogue
0 AP
They didn’t even TOUCH the legality part lmao. What a bunch of wusses
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DACAgogue
View Public Profile
Send a private message to DACAgogue
Find all posts by DACAgogue
#10
10-05-2022, 05:37 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
317 posts
Imthexman's Avatar
Imthexman
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dauser View Post
so it wont reach the supreme court?
To reach the supreme court, the red estates whom initiated the lawsuit would have to ask the supreme court to take on their lawsuit but the Supreme Court does not have to take it, and most likely they wont since the estates wouldn't be appealing the higher court (5th circuit) but the lower court (Hanen), the supreme court in almost all cases take cases coming from circuit court rather than lower courts
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Imthexman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Imthexman
Find all posts by Imthexman
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›
  • last »


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.