• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Kennedy move deals blow to immigration reform plan

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
12-08-2008, 11:07 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
0 AP
I guess we'll just have to do without him,but I'm sure he has his reasons for prioritizing health care instead.
Quote:
Sen. Edward Kennedy’s (D-Mass.) allies on immigration reform regard his departure from the Judiciary Committee as a withering blow to their cause and are searching for a new champion on the controversial issue..........

..........Some see his decision to leave his post as chairman of the Judiciary Immigration subcommittee as a sign that Democrats will hold off on the topic in the 111th Congress.

“I’ve had this conversation with a couple people and I would say that Kennedy’s loss from the Judiciary Committee is disappointing,” said Randel Johnson, vice president of labor, immigration and employee benefits at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which was a major supporter of Kennedy’s legislation. “It will adversely affect immigration reform going forward. It indicates the chances of comprehensive reform happening over the next few years are slim.”

But an aide to Kennedy dismissed the notion that his boss would abandon immigration reform altogether, noting that Kennedy promised to remain involved.

When Kennedy announced that he would step down from Judiciary and give up his gavel as chairman of the Immigration subcommittee, he said: “I remain deeply committed to civil rights, equal opportunities and immigration reform, and I will always be involved in those important debates and discussions.”

His statement has given little consolation to his allies in the effort to pass sweeping legislation, a goal that critics deride as “amnesty” for illegal workers.

While Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) in previous interviews has said the Senate will take up immigration reform in the 111th Congress, some proponents doubt President-elect Obama and Democrats will make the issue a top priority during the first years of his administration.

Rahm Emanuel, who will serve as White House chief of staff, predicted last year that immigration reform would not happen in the first term of a Democratic presidency.

Emanuel, who has seen immigration as a dangerous issue for Democrats, repeatedly battled members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus to block consideration of an immigration package in the House while he was a member of the House Democratic leadership.

During an interview with CNN shortly before Election Day, Obama left immigration off his list of priorities.

Now the potential loss of a champion on the issue in the Senate clouds its prospects even more.

Those who have followed the heated immigration debate on Capitol Hill say it will be difficult for someone to step into Kennedy’s shoes and lead on such a complex and controversial issue.

“Politically and substantively, it’s a challenging issue, but it has to be resolved,” said Sonia Ramirez, a legislative representative at the AFL-CIO, which did not support the final version of immigration reform that Kennedy pushed in 2007. “I can’t believe they’ll allow this issue to go by the wayside but, certainly, Kennedy has demonstrated that it requires a lot of leadership to move forward.”


Others say that the enormity of the task and Kennedy’s fragile health forced him to choose between healthcare and immigration as a perhaps final addition to his legacy.

“My sense is that he’s certainly been in a compromised medical state and either of those issues is a massive, massive job,” said Marshall Fitz, director of advocacy at the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

Fitz said Kennedy’s departure from Judiciary would “really leave a hole” on the panel, but noted that Reid could appoint a strong advocate of reform to replace him.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) is next in line on the Immigration subcommittee. Immigration reform advocates describe Feinstein as a “fair” and “independent” legislator but not as passionate an advocate as Kennedy. She could also have her hands full if chosen as chairwoman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence next year.

Indeed, few lawmakers seem eager to play as prominent role as Kennedy — even logical successors such as Sen. Ken Salazar (D-Colo.), who is one of three Hispanic senators.

A Salazar aide said his boss will play the same role in the immigration debate as he has in the past.

The aide said Salazar is happy with his committee assignments and does not seem eager to join Judiciary.

An aide to Sen. Robert Menendez (N.J.), the other Hispanic in the Democratic Conference, did not venture to say what his boss would do on immigration next year.


The loss of leadership has given opponents of comprehensive reform reason to crow.

“It makes it even less likely there’s going to be a big amnesty bill,” said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, a conservative think tank. “Kennedy for 40 years has been the engine driving immigration legislation in Congress.”

Nevertheless, some proponents of a creating a path to citizenship for undocumented workers hold out hope that legislation could move during Obama’s first term.

“I think it’s going to move in the first year,” said Fitz. “I think the better question is how Democrats can try to not try to move on immigration.”

Even so, Fitz acknowledged that immigration “probably doesn’t rise to [the level of] healthcare on the priority list.”
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#2
12-08-2008, 11:15 PM
Senior Member
From NJ
Joined in Sep 2008
289 posts
verve's Avatar
verve
verve
View Public Profile
Send a private message to verve
Visit verve's homepage!
Find all posts by verve
0 AP
what does this mean for us?
__________________

  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#3
12-08-2008, 11:20 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2006
3,617 posts
lilbawler2001's Avatar
lilbawler2001
lilbawler2001
View Public Profile
Send a private message to lilbawler2001
Find all posts by lilbawler2001
50 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by verve View Post
what does this mean for us?

Quote:
It makes it even less likely there’s going to be a big amnesty bill,” said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, a conservative think tank. “Kennedy for 40 years has been the engine driving immigration legislation in Congress
Regardless, we are going to win our dream in 2009.
__________________
Application Sent - 8/22 Chicago Lockbox
Delivered - 8/24
Date of I-797 C Notice of Action - 9/04
Date of Biometrics Appointment - 9/28
Date of EAD and Daca approval - 11/30
Last edited by lilbawler2001; 12-08-2008 at 11:26 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#4
12-08-2008, 11:32 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
0 AP
^^No doubt,Dream act has always been our priority as we should only focus on what we know of.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#5
12-09-2008, 12:23 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,652 posts
dado123
dado123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dado123
Find all posts by dado123
0 AP
Durbin is still very passionate about dream.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#6
12-09-2008, 12:43 AM
Member
From the bay
Joined in Nov 2008
59 posts
dayDREAMer...'s Avatar
dayDREAMer...
dayDREAMer...
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dayDREAMer...
Find all posts by dayDREAMer...
0 AP
does this directly affect DREAM or is it more isolated towards CIR?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#7
12-09-2008, 01:52 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2008
1,379 posts
vivace
vivace
View Public Profile
Send a private message to vivace
Find all posts by vivace
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dayDREAMer... View Post
does this directly affect DREAM or is it more isolated towards CIR?
Sounds like it is leaning toward CIR.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#8
12-09-2008, 01:58 AM
Member
Joined in Dec 2008
88 posts
sunny_thedreamer
sunny_thedreamer
View Public Profile
Send a private message to sunny_thedreamer
Find all posts by sunny_thedreamer
0 AP
I've been following immigration debate for long time and dream act since 2003. I'm frustrated. I got to say, democrats have no balls and so is obama (u never hear him talk immigration publicly). And i hate the choice of manual? That guy is responsible for house not debating immigration last year. he is a true politician. And, my guess is dream act won't be debate b/c it has outside chance of passing but it is not a politically winnable issue. All u hear from democrat abt bipartisanship and rule from center and reach out. But why? U never hear that from republican. They rule from right and right wing agenda. They don't care. If dream act is one of republican agenda and hell is frozen and republican won majority just like democrat this year, you would've seen it pass within one week,after taking power. Offcouse democrat would never do that. Obama is in white house b/c of large number of Hispanic and black vote. They need to rule from left and take on left agenda and steam roll over republican.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#9
12-09-2008, 04:28 AM
Senior Member
From CA
Joined in Oct 2008
201 posts
lu001's Avatar
lu001
lu001
View Public Profile
Send a private message to lu001
Visit lu001's homepage!
Find all posts by lu001
0 AP
I have to agree that the sometimes Democrats compromise too much. However, I still think the Dream Act has a good chance of passing, even without Kennedy.
We cannot put all our hope on a single individual. All those people who were interviewed have the attitude that is responsible for the delay in immigration reform. They are always waiting for a messiah to come rescue them.

Something will be done, otherwise all these meetings we keep hearing about wouldn't be happening. We just have to make sure we do our part.
__________________
A Little Piece of Paper
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#10
12-09-2008, 08:16 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2006
3,617 posts
lilbawler2001's Avatar
lilbawler2001
lilbawler2001
View Public Profile
Send a private message to lilbawler2001
Find all posts by lilbawler2001
50 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by lu001 View Post
I have to agree that the sometimes Democrats compromise too much. However, I still think the Dream Act has a good chance of passing, even without Kennedy.
We cannot put all our hope on a single individual. All those people who were interviewed have the attitude that is responsible for the delay in immigration reform. They are always waiting for a messiah to come rescue them.

Something will be done, otherwise all these meetings we keep hearing about wouldn't be happening. We just have to make sure we do our part.
I am sure he will still vote and help pass the dream act. He is just stepping down from his post as judiciary chairman and os not changing his position on immigration reform. Let's us pray that he is healthy and can be on capitol hill when the dream act comes up for a vote next time.
__________________
Application Sent - 8/22 Chicago Lockbox
Delivered - 8/24
Date of I-797 C Notice of Action - 9/04
Date of Biometrics Appointment - 9/28
Date of EAD and Daca approval - 11/30
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.