• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

SOLUTION/SHARRY: The answer on immigration

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
12-14-2008, 09:22 PM
Senior Member
From California- silicon valley
Joined in Jul 2008
385 posts
originalgabe
originalgabe
View Public Profile
Send a private message to originalgabe
Find all posts by originalgabe
0 AP
http://washingtontimes.com/news/2008...tion-66606138/


Quote:
rank Sharry
Sunday, December 14, 2008

On Election Day, the American people hired leaders they believe will tackle and solve tough problems. They fired politicians who cover up inaction and ineffectiveness with slick sound bites and punchy slogans.

The public wants action -- and results -- on a range of tough issues. Of course, economic recovery is job number one, but the public demand for action on illegal immigration has been underestimated for too long.

Both presidential candidates got it. They promised action on immigration reform in their first year. Moreover, when the Obama campaign quietly put together transition teams on seven priority policy areas to begin work months before Election Day, immigration reform made the cut.

Why is illegal immigration now a top-tier policy concern? Is it anger at the illegal immigrants? No. In a recent poll conducted by Sergio Bendixen for NDN only 3 percent of voters blame them. Employers who game the system? Yes, nearly a quarter of voters blame employers, many of whom are seen as unscrupulous actors who underpay workers and skip out on taxes. But by a 2-1 margin the public blames the federal government and Congress. Failure to solve illegal immigration is now a symbol of how Washington doesn't work.

This is what most Democrats now get and most Republicans don't. In 2008, Barack Obama and the vast majority of Democratic candidates for Congress defined themselves as in favor of comprehensive immigration reform. The key elements of comprehensive reform are strong enforcement at the borders and the workplace coupled with a requirement that those here illegally pass criminal background checks, pay taxes, study English and get to the back of the citizenship line. This is viewed by the majority of Americans as the most pragmatic approach to this complicated problem.

In contrast, most Republicans adopted a harder line. John McCain felt compelled to pander to make-'em-all-leave primary voters with a promise of "border security first." In contested congressional races, most Republicans trumpeted the enforcement-only position of "no amnesty" so popular with talk radio and anti-immigration groups.

The results? Mr. Obama trounced Mr. McCain with Latino voters generally (67 percent to 31 percent) and Latino immigrant voters especially (75 percent to 25 percent). This represents a dramatic shift from the success George W. Bush had in 2004 (John Kerry won 59 percent to 40 percent with Latinos generally and only 52 percent to 48 percent with Latino immigrants). The results in battleground congressional races was just as stark. In 22 battleground House and Senate races where a Republican enforcement-only hawk challenged Democratic candidates who favored a more comprehensive approach to reform, the reform-minded Democrat won in 20.

What does this mean for the upcoming policy debate? Look for President Obama and Democratic leaders to lean into the issue and propose a worker and taxpayer-friendly approach to immigration reform. I can see it now. It's Citizenship Day -- Sept. 17, 2009. The president, surrounded by the smiling faces of flag-waving newly minted citizens, makes the case for reform.
That would be SO nice
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#2
12-14-2008, 09:44 PM
Junior Member
From New Jersey
Joined in Dec 2008
24 posts
mandeep1803's Avatar
mandeep1803
mandeep1803
View Public Profile
Send a private message to mandeep1803
Find all posts by mandeep1803
0 AP
From a political standpoint, I really don't know how the immigration reforms can be achieved. Two unpopular wars, crashing economy, and a world of problems face President-Elect Obama. I like to think there is a solution coming withing one or two years but my political mind tells me it could be quite hard.
__________________
"Cowards die many times before their deaths; the valiant never taste of death but once."

-William Shakespeare
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#3
12-14-2008, 09:59 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2007
165 posts
meehx3
meehx3
View Public Profile
Send a private message to meehx3
Find all posts by meehx3
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by mandeep1803 View Post
From a political standpoint, I really don't know how the immigration reforms can be achieved. Two unpopular wars, crashing economy, and a world of problems face President-Elect Obama. I like to think there is a solution coming withing one or two years but my political mind tells me it could be quite hard.
as much as i don't want to admit it, i also think this is the case.
i love that we're so optimistic here.
i want to feel that optimism, but i've been dissappointed too many times.
we all desparately need this, but the question is, will it be politically possible?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#4
12-14-2008, 11:32 PM
Senior Member
From L.A., California
Joined in Oct 2007
960 posts
kenny1314
kenny1314
View Public Profile
Send a private message to kenny1314
Find all posts by kenny1314
0 AP
i doubt with it......
__________________
OBAMA-BIDEN 2008
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#5
12-15-2008, 09:33 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2006
3,617 posts
lilbawler2001's Avatar
lilbawler2001
lilbawler2001
View Public Profile
Send a private message to lilbawler2001
Find all posts by lilbawler2001
50 AP
What a bunch of pessimists, you are not the only ones who have been dissapointed in the past you know.
__________________
Application Sent - 8/22 Chicago Lockbox
Delivered - 8/24
Date of I-797 C Notice of Action - 9/04
Date of Biometrics Appointment - 9/28
Date of EAD and Daca approval - 11/30
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#6
12-15-2008, 11:21 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2008
189 posts
minus
minus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to minus
Find all posts by minus
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilbawler2001 View Post
What a bunch of pessimists
Right on! We need to stay positive.....
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#7
12-15-2008, 12:44 PM
Senior Member
From NJ
Joined in Aug 2008
428 posts
Jay Stone's Avatar
Jay Stone
Jay Stone
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Jay Stone
Find all posts by Jay Stone
0 AP
Lets not forget that the congress is not a group a folk who cant walk and chew gum at the same time. Lets also not forget that DREAM is not CIR, it's not going to be this massive overload, they call it Piecemeal immigration for a reason. This will get some light shined upon it next year, and we will achieve what we've longed for.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#8
12-15-2008, 10:42 PM
Senior Member
From NJ
Joined in Sep 2008
289 posts
verve's Avatar
verve
verve
View Public Profile
Send a private message to verve
Visit verve's homepage!
Find all posts by verve
0 AP
listen. CIR is not gonna happen next yr. Republicans are still bitter as hell. Dream Act however ALMOST got through last yr so there is a fairly good chance that this time around we can't fail. Plus we are getting organized fairly well so we'll put up a good fight. So convince yourself that Dream Act is going to get passed this yr and we'll make it happen. 2009!!
__________________

  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#9
12-15-2008, 11:42 PM
Junior Member
From New Jersey
Joined in Dec 2008
24 posts
mandeep1803's Avatar
mandeep1803
mandeep1803
View Public Profile
Send a private message to mandeep1803
Find all posts by mandeep1803
0 AP
Guys, I am not being a pessimist. You just need to think critically and have a backup plan for stuff. I agree with the positive sentiments but there are always at least 2 sides to an issue. One must look at all the sides to understand the gravity of the situation.

I hope it passes but there are enough people blocking any sort of real work from being done in the political system.
__________________
"Cowards die many times before their deaths; the valiant never taste of death but once."

-William Shakespeare
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#10
12-16-2008, 01:09 AM
Senior Member
From California- silicon valley
Joined in Jul 2008
385 posts
originalgabe
originalgabe
View Public Profile
Send a private message to originalgabe
Find all posts by originalgabe
0 AP
just posted this so that we can see another positive perspective, Ive seen many a journalist, activists and just folk like us that are becoming more and more optimistic that something will happen (wether DREAM and/or CIR) in the next 2 years.

Im trying to stay optimistic with a touch of realist. But its a good thing to see so much movement in the blogsphere and so many people exited. it will help create a momentum we will need to succeeed.

DREAM '09!!!
Last edited by originalgabe; 12-16-2008 at 01:11 AM.. Reason: soooo cooold i cant type...must conserve energy, NO heat
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.