DREAM Act Portal Forum - Supreme Court DACA watch

DREAM Act Portal Forum (http://dreamact.info/forum/index.php)

- The News Room (http://dreamact.info/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=23)

- - Supreme Court DACA watch (http://dreamact.info/forum/showthread.php?t=83683)

Re: Supreme Court DACA watch

Quote:

Originally Posted by dreamer__13 (Post 738197)

Shiet. You’re right. I read that wrong. I guess we gotta wait until Thursday or Friday.

Girl, calm down. They are not doing shit. They are circle jerking in their private chamber and rolling a dice to determine whether hearing a case.

:(

Re: Supreme Court DACA watch

Quote:

Originally Posted by ECW (Post 738198)

Isn't this part about SCOTUS:

I think that's in reference to the DC court because of the chain of tweets. Might be wrong about that though.

Re: Supreme Court DACA watch

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwxie518 (Post 738199)

Girl, calm down. They are not doing shit. They are circle jerking in their private chamber and rolling a dice to determine whether hearing a case.

:(

Girl, they coming for Psyducks first.

Re: Supreme Court DACA watch

Will today be another possible decision at 9:30?

Re: Supreme Court DACA watch

Quote:

Originally Posted by ECW (Post 738229)

Will today be another possible decision at 9:30?

I think today is only opinions, I may be wrong. Thursday and friday orders.

Re: Supreme Court DACA watch

Carol Zimmermann
‏
Verified account

@carolmaczim
Follow Follow @carolmaczim
More
So with court's last day tomorrow, announcement of court hearing or rejecting #DACA will be Friday.

https://twitter.com/carolmaczim/stat...89762958360576

Re: Supreme Court DACA watch

Quote:

Greg Stohr
@GregStohr
Good night, Supreme Court. See you tomorrow for those 9:30 orders that are likely to include DACA and abortion action.

https://mobile.twitter.com/GregStohr...89732224442369

Re: Supreme Court DACA watch

Quote:

Originally Posted by ECW (Post 738363)

https://mobile.twitter.com/GregStohr...89732224442369

Vaya con Dios...

Re: Supreme Court DACA watch

Quote:

Originally Posted by dreamer__13 (Post 738368)

Vaya con Dios...

Our culitos are in his hands.

Re: Supreme Court DACA watch

Quote:

Josh Blackman
‏
Verified account

@JoshMBlackman
Follow Follow @JoshMBlackman
More
44/ There is indeed an overlap between the Census question and the DACA rescission. To quote Justice Breyer, "The agency’s decision memorandum provided one and only one reason."

Quote:

Josh Blackman
‏
Verified account

@JoshMBlackman
59m59 minutes ago
More
45/ The majority opinion lays out a roadmap--offer several reasons, and see if one sticks. In other words, don't put eggs in one basket. Give the actual justification, among others, even if it may generate political backlash.

Quote:

Josh Blackman
‏
Verified account

@JoshMBlackman
60m60 minutes ago
More
46/ Had the Secretary rescinded DACA because the policy was no longer desired by the administration, and nothing else, the APA claims would fail. By giving a legal justification that was contestable, courts have held up the policy for 2 years.

Quote:

Josh Blackman
‏
Verified account

@JoshMBlackman
22m22 minutes ago
More
47/ J. Alito's dissent is a not-to-subtle reference to the proliferation of nationwide injunctions. He worries that motivated parties can forum shop until they find a judge who finds an executive action is pretextual.

Quote:

48/ Alito also distinguishes APA challenges from constitutional challenges: in the latter, courts can inquire about pretext; in the former they cannot.

Quote:

Josh Blackman
‏
Verified account

@JoshMBlackman
10m10 minutes ago
More
49/ DOJ asserted this position in the travel ban litigation: the President's decision to issue the proclamation was not reviewable under the APA, but it was reviewable under the Establishment Clause. #SCOTUS rejected the arg there.

https://twitter.com/JoshMBlackman

Legal minds, what does this means?

Re: Supreme Court DACA watch

Josh Blackman
‏
Verified account

@JoshMBlackman
20m20 minutes ago
More
51/ But in Hawaii, the government was able to paper over a sufficient justification to defend the policy. As a result, the travel ban was constitutional. In contrast, the *only*

Josh Blackman
‏
Verified account

Quote:

@JoshMBlackman
Follow Follow @JoshMBlackman
More
52/ The way forward is clear: offer other reasons that are legitimate, and you will get 5 votes. Same for DACA. Offer other reasons that are legitimate, and the policy can be rescinded.

Re: Supreme Court DACA watch

Whelp, this is it people. It's been a good run.

Re: Supreme Court DACA watch

ECW you’re always posting negative stuff then proven wrong. You’re the 2Face of the negative crowd here