• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

August

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Massachusetts Rejects Secure Communities

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
06-06-2011, 05:36 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
1,932 posts
Feenmi's Avatar
Feenmi
290 AP
Quote:
WASHINGTON -- Massachusetts will not sign onto the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) controversial fingerprint-sharing system, Democratic Gov. Deval Patrick announced on Monday, becoming the third governor in recent weeks to reject it.

Patrick has chosen not to sign a memorandum of understanding to participate in the Secure Communities immigration enforcement program. It was touted as a way to find and deport dangerous criminals, but the program has come under fire for using biometric information collected by local police to deport large numbers of law-abiding undocumented men and women.

"Governor Patrick and I share your public safety objectives and agree serious criminals who are here illegally should be deported," Margaret Heffernan of the state's Executive Office on Public Safety and Security wrote in a letter to DHS. "However, Secure Communities, as implemented nationally, does not reflect those objectives."

About a quarter of those deported under the program nationwide are never convicted of a crime, which immigration advocates say is due to racial profiling and police overstepping their duties to enforce immigration.

Discontent against Secure Communities is growing. New York rejected the program in May and bills against the DHS initiative are moving forward in California and Illinois, where Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn has already told the agency that his state will no longer participate.

Massachusetts' case is slightly different from the other states. While the other three moving against Secure Communities had already officially joined the program with DHS, the Bay State had not yet signed on.

But it remains unclear whether Massachusetts can actually "opt out" of Secure Communities. Although Massachusetts had not signed on at the statewide level, the program is already in use in Suffolk County, which includes Boston. And DHS officials confirmed that the agency will continue to use fingerprints from Illinois and New York for immigration enforcement.

DHS did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the Massachusetts letter. But the letter to Secure Communities Acting Director Marc Rapp, acknowledged that part of the governor's concern is based on the agency's "conflicting messages" over whether the program is mandatory.

"We are reluctant to participate if the program is mandatory and unwilling to participate if it is voluntary," Heffernan wrote.

The agency plans to spread the program nationwide by 2013. It is currently in place in 1,331 of 3,181 counties nationwide, including all of those in states along the Mexican border.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_871970.html
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Feenmi
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Feenmi
Find all posts by Feenmi
#2
06-06-2011, 05:59 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2010
828 posts
Alex QA's Avatar
Alex QA
0 AP
is it possible that CIR comes after all 3,181 counties nationwide are using it in 2013??
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Alex QA
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Alex QA
Find all posts by Alex QA
#3
06-06-2011, 06:12 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2010
1,256 posts
iDream
0 AP
we want DREAM ACT! hoorah!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
iDream
View Public Profile
Send a private message to iDream
Find all posts by iDream
#4
06-06-2011, 07:23 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
626 posts
Nic89
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex QA View Post
is it possible that CIR comes after all 3,181 counties nationwide are using it in 2013??
I think we might see DA votting before 2013, but CIR/DA is only possible if Obama relected and Democrates hold majority in both chambers like they did in 2008 then it has good chances of passing through just like Health Care. Hopefully Obama will Push for it right after 2013 election and lern lession from Bush not to wait untill end of his presidency.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Nic89
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Nic89
Find all posts by Nic89
#5
06-07-2011, 12:25 AM
BANNED
From San Bernardino, CA
Joined in Sep 2010
1,202 posts
LifeDreamer
0 AP
Nic89 is right... And I do see things happening..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
LifeDreamer
View Public Profile
Find all posts by LifeDreamer


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.