New GOP immigration bill would prevent separation of children and parents at border - Page 2
- previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
yeah..sad but true.
its just the hand that dems are dealt because they are in the minority in every branch of govt.
gotta work with what ya get..
its just the hand that dems are dealt because they are in the minority in every branch of govt.
gotta work with what ya get..
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Smooth
I agree with that. But, the separations are happening, and those kids need to be protected.
For Dems, diversity lottery or protect children . . . . |
__________________
initial DACA: 6/20122nd renewal: 9/2014
3rd renewal: 11/2016
4th renewal: 11/2018
Post your reply or quote more messages.
__________________
#Lawgic
Last edited by Smooth; 06-13-2018 at 04:53 PM..
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
whats the difference?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dreamer1980
Age-in is not the same as Age-out dreamers. Hope I'm wrong
|
__________________
initial DACA: 6/20122nd renewal: 9/2014
3rd renewal: 11/2016
4th renewal: 11/2018
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dreamer1980
“It will protect all Dreamers — those that signed up for DACA, those that did not but were eligible, as well as those that have been aged in,” Denham told reporters earlier Wednesday, after House Republicans met behind closed doors at the Capitol Hill Club.
Age-in is not the same as Age-out dreamers. Hope I'm wrong |
“It will protect all Dreamers — those that signed up for DACA, those that did not but were eligible, as well as those that have been aged in," Denham told reporters Wednesday, after House Republicans met behind closed doors at the Capitol Hill Club.”
Pretty sure that you can’t get anymore clear than that. Keyword is all.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984
Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...-votes-n882756
Not sure if this was aforementioned, if so please close mods (or delete). Not sure why this needs to be included in the bills; this shouldn't be happening to begin with. That's some sketch human rights violation that the Nazi's did as they separated families through their raids. |
Then why not proceed with the discharge petition which INCLUDED THE VOTE FOR RYAN'S BILL??
Post your reply or quote more messages.
the discharge petition didnt hit the 218 signatures needed. it only had 216.
right now to pass anything in the house, they just need 215.
why are you so obsessed with this?
right now to pass anything in the house, they just need 215.
why are you so obsessed with this?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dtrt09
What?!
Then why not proceed with the discharge petition which INCLUDED THE VOTE FOR RYAN'S BILL?? |
__________________
initial DACA: 6/20122nd renewal: 9/2014
3rd renewal: 11/2016
4th renewal: 11/2018
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dreamer1980
It will protect all Dreamers those that signed up for DACA, those that did not but were eligible, as well as those that have been aged in, Denham told reporters earlier Wednesday, after House Republicans met behind closed doors at the Capitol Hill Club.
Age-in is not the same as Age-out dreamers. Hope I'm wrong |
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dtrt09
What?!
Then why not proceed with the discharge petition which INCLUDED THE VOTE FOR RYAN'S BILL?? |
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Smooth
-Wall (both sides can agree on)
-Dreamer legalization (both sides can agree on) -Elimination of Diversity Lottery (contentious) <-------This is the problem. This issue. -Stop separating children from parents (seems like both sides can agree to this) Stop separating children and legalize all dreamers outweighs the whole concern over legal immigration cuts and the diversity visa lottery. schumer. Or we can prioritize legal immigration and throw ourselves and those children being separated under the bus. Your pick. |
schumer and dems agreed to remove adult children and siblings from family based in 2013 CIR, why they are making it an issue now? just to deny Trump a win?
if compromise bill covers
1. Legalization of 1.8 million dreamers
2. Border Wall (schumer agreed on it 6 months ago)
3. DV (they agreed except few in Democrat caucus)
4. removal of adult children and siblings from family based (democrats agreed in 2013)
and no Everify or any other poison pill then its the deal we should take it an force democrats to take it.
its trump 4 pillers minus barring the ability to sponsor parents, again a win for us to help our parents.
we should take it before SC intervene and stop DACA renewals.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
- previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»