Nakasec Legislative updated #2[Dream related] - Page 2
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
hey all, this is sookyung with nakasec. after meeting with rep. berman's staff, it was recommended that we weigh in by submitting in writing our thoughts about how to specifically strengthening the dream act to increase eligibility. in writing this letter, we definitely had in context the political climate and the history of the dream act. at the end, we wrote about the four things 1) bring back community service provision as a third means for legalization (original dream act), 2) no age caps, 3) change from 15 years or younger to 17 years or younger (technical definition of minor is under 1
, and 4) re-instate language that encourages states to define in-state tuition eligibility for undocumented students. i guess that we'll see soon what the final bill language will be.
, and 4) re-instate language that encourages states to define in-state tuition eligibility for undocumented students. i guess that we'll see soon what the final bill language will be.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sookyung
hey all, this is sookyung with nakasec. after meeting with rep. berman's staff, it was recommended that we weigh in by submitting in writing our thoughts about how to specifically strengthening the dream act to increase eligibility. in writing this letter, we definitely had in context the political climate and the history of the dream act. at the end, we wrote about the four things 1) bring back community service provision as a third means for legalization (original dream act), 2) no age caps, 3) change from 15 years or younger to 17 years or younger (technical definition of minor is under 1
, and 4) re-instate language that encourages states to define in-state tuition eligibility for undocumented students. i guess that we'll see soon what the final bill language will be. |
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»