• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

March

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The Lounge

Possible way out for aged-out dreamers - brainstorming - Page 3

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
#21
06-18-2012, 01:52 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
The 'prosecutorial discretion' is the June 2011 Morton memo which helps people who are in some kind of removing proceedings though.

Where did you get this advice? What would a lawyer say?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dado123 View Post
@DA USER,

I got the following Legal Advice regarding the June 15, 2012 Deferred Action Memo.

The document cites "prosecutorial discretion" may be exercised if people do not meet the eligibility requirements. What that means is that the prosecutor can choose to look at the facts of your case and say "Even though he / she doesn't meet a single requirement, he / she meets them in every other way so therefore I am going to ignore it."

^^ I paraphrased , the concept applies to not meeting one of the 5 Requirements for Deferred Action under the June 15, 2012 Deferred Action memo.

What do you think , will they weigh the case in its totality and opt to ignore a dreamer not meeting one of the five requirements ?

I made a bad choice and got "SIGNIFICANT MISDEMEANOR" as defined in the Memo.

Let me know your thoughts !
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#22
06-18-2012, 02:05 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,655 posts
dado123
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
The 'prosecutorial discretion' is the June 2011 Morton memo which helps people who are in some kind of removing proceedings though.

Where did you get this advice? What would a lawyer say?
I got the advice from a lawyer, I perhaps did not explain it as much I should have. How the June 15, 2012 memo works is that Proset¢orial Discretion is used to evaluate a case to offer deferred action.

Prosecutorial Discretation is mentioned through out the memo, but yes you are correct the June 17, 2011 memo also mentions Prosecutorial Discretation.

Now let know what you think, the idea i have is that the officer can weigh the case in its totality and choose to use his "PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION" and offer Deferred Action, even though one of the requirements is not met, I am quoting what the lawyer mentioned:

QUOTE
However, what I suspect is going to actually happen is that you can make the argument at the beginning and then again if you are denied. If the government believes that the prosecutor will allow you to remain then they likely will address everything at the same time, even if they are not technically supposed to.
UNQUOTE

Let me know your further thoughts ?


http://www.ice.gov/doclib/about/offi...on-process.pdf
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dado123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dado123
Find all posts by dado123
#23
06-18-2012, 02:09 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
So is up to the officer and not the head of USCIS to make a decision? What if the officer is having a bad day or does not like you for some reason?

So let's say you are denied then what happens next? They leave you alone or put you in removal proceedings? What are the risks?


Quote:
Originally Posted by dado123 View Post
I got the advice from a lawyer, I perhaps did not explain it as much I should have. How the June 15, 2012 memo works is that Proset¢orial Discretion is used to evaluate a case to offer deferred action.

Prosecutorial Discretation is mentioned through out the memo, but yes you are correct the June 17, 2011 memo also mentions Prosecutorial Discretation.

Now let know what you think, the idea i have is that the officer can weigh the case in its totality and choose to use his "PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION" and offer Deferred Action, even though one of the requirements is not met, I am quoting what the lawyer mentioned:

QUOTE
However, what I suspect is going to actually happen is that you can make the argument at the beginning and then again if you are denied. If the government believes that the prosecutor will allow you to remain then they likely will address everything at the same time, even if they are not technically supposed to.
UNQUOTE

Let me know your further thoughts ?


http://www.ice.gov/doclib/about/offi...on-process.pdf
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#24
06-18-2012, 02:25 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,655 posts
dado123
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
The 'prosecutorial discretion' is the June 2011 Morton memo which helps people who are in some kind of removing proceedings though.

Where did you get this advice? What would a lawyer say?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
So is up to the officer and not the head of USCIS to make a decision? What if the officer is having a bad day or does not like you for some reason?

So let's say you are denied then what happens next? They leave you alone or put you in removal proceedings? What are the risks?
So let's say you are denied then what happens next? They leave you alone or put you in removal proceedings? What are the risks?


^^^ I think, this is my evaluation from studying the June 15, 2012 memo, if you are denied they will only refer your case to ICE for removal proceedings if they find criminal activity on you, if there is no criminal activity they will not refer your case to ICE.

Here I quote from the June 15, 2012 memo.

QUOTE
If an individual’s request to USCIS for deferred action is denied, will he or she be placed in
removal proceedings?
For individuals whose requests for deferred action are denied by USCIS, USCIS will apply its existing
Notice to Appear guidance governing USCIS’s referral of cases to ICE and issuance of notices to appear.
Under this guidance, individuals whose requests are denied under this process will be referred to ICE if
they have a criminal conviction or there is a finding of fraud in their request
UNQUOTE

However by having a notice to appear you can then opt for a review under the June 17, 2011 Memo that does not offer Deferred Action , but in chatting with a fellow Dreamer whom had there case "Administratively Closed" via the June 17, 2011 Memo, he thinks there is a way for Deferred Action to be granted for people whose cases were Administratively Closed via the June 17, 2011.


Let me have some good constructive thoughts DA USER. ,
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dado123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dado123
Find all posts by dado123
#25
06-18-2012, 02:29 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
They will run a background check for that. You are just throwing out ideas though. What does the lawyer say? So let's say the candidate is all clean then if denied, case closed? Re-appeal?

I think it would still be best speaking to multiple lawyers on this. Stuff can get complicated.





Quote:
Originally Posted by dado123 View Post
So let's say you are denied then what happens next? They leave you alone or put you in removal proceedings? What are the risks?


^^^ I think, this is my evaluation from studying the June 15, 2012 memo, if you are denied they will only refer your case to ICE for removal proceedings if they find criminal activity on you, if there is no criminal activity they will not refer your case to ICE.

Here I quote from the June 15, 2012 memo.

QUOTE
If an individual’s request to USCIS for deferred action is denied, will he or she be placed in
removal proceedings?
For individuals whose requests for deferred action are denied by USCIS, USCIS will apply its existing
Notice to Appear guidance governing USCIS’s referral of cases to ICE and issuance of notices to appear.
Under this guidance, individuals whose requests are denied under this process will be referred to ICE if
they have a criminal conviction or there is a finding of fraud in their request
UNQUOTE

However by having a notice to appear you can then opt for a review under the June 17, 2011 Memo that does not offer Deferred Action , but in chatting with a fellow Dreamer whom had there case "Administratively Closed" via the June 17, 2011 Memo, he thinks there is a way for Deferred Action to be granted for people whose cases were Administratively Closed via the June 17, 2011.


Let me have some good constructive thoughts DA USER. ,
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#26
06-18-2012, 02:42 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,655 posts
dado123
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
They will run a background check for that. You are just throwing out ideas though. What does the lawyer say? So let's say the candidate is all clean then if denied, case closed? Re-appeal?

I think it would still be best speaking to multiple lawyers on this. Stuff can get complicated.
I asked the lawyer:

After I apply for the June 15th DEFERRED ACTION MEMO AND I AM REJECTED, I CAN THEN OPT APPLY FOR THE JUNE 2011 MEMO,

Reply I got:
Quote

You can apply for the prosecutorial discretion if you are denied. due to being ineligible.

UNQUOTE

The consultation ended with:

QUOTE

I think you have a good chance of the prosecutor allowing you to remain even if you are rejected the first time. I think you DO NOT qualify under the rules but they may approve you anyway. Even if they don't then it is likely the prosecutor will exercise his discretion and allow you to remain. Based on what is being said I'd bet your chances are above 80%.

UNQUOTE

These are legal advice, of course a second , third opinion is always suggested.

Now I think there is some way to make work, but I still have to research further.

Let me have your thoughts D.A. USER, any ideas to further this is helpful !
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dado123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dado123
Find all posts by dado123
#27
06-18-2012, 02:45 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
You sure bring a lot of hope for the 31+ Dreamers. 80% is still not good. It is still rolling a dice with your life.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dado123 View Post
I asked the lawyer:

After I apply for the June 15th DEFERRED ACTION MEMO AND I AM REJECTED, I CAN THEN OPT APPLY FOR THE JUNE 2011 MEMO,

Reply I got:
Quote

You can apply for the prosecutorial discretion if you are denied. due to being ineligible.

UNQUOTE

The consultation ended with:

QUOTE

I think you have a good chance of the prosecutor allowing you to remain even if you are rejected the first time. I think you DO NOT qualify under the rules but they may approve you anyway. Even if they don't then it is likely the prosecutor will exercise his discretion and allow you to remain. Based on what is being said I'd bet your chances are above 80%.

UNQUOTE

These are legal advice, of course a second , third opinion is always suggested.

Now I think there is some way to make work, but I still have to research further.

Let me have your thoughts D.A. USER, any ideas to further this is helpful !
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#28
06-18-2012, 02:52 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,655 posts
dado123
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
They will run a background check for that. You are just throwing out ideas though. What does the lawyer say? So let's say the candidate is all clean then if denied, case closed? Re-appeal?

I think it would still be best speaking to multiple lawyers on this. Stuff can get complicated.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
You sure bring a lot of hope for the 31+ Dreamers. 80% is still not good. It is still rolling a dice with your life.
I think we have to "FRONT LOAD" our case if you will, bring everything to the table, elementary records, middle school records, high school records, any certificates, honor roll you may have made, your Junior College Degree, BA degree, any community service, etc, etc, then as the lawyer said:

Quote
"prosecutorial discretion" may be exercised if people do not meet the eligibility requirements. What that means is that the prosecutor can choose to look at the facts of your case and say "Even though he doesn't meet the requirements because [i.e.fill in the blank], he meets them in every other way so therefore I am going to ignore it."
UNQUOTE

I am going to continue the research and be as much informed as possible when I decide whether to or not apply, what are your thoughts ?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dado123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dado123
Find all posts by dado123
#29
06-18-2012, 02:55 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
I will also speak to multiple lawyers and see what they say. Lot of them offer free advice for a few minutes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dado123 View Post
I think we have to "FRONT LOAD" our case if you will, bring everything to the table, elementary records, middle school records, high school records, any certificates, honor roll you may have made, your Junior College Degree, BA degree, any community service, etc, etc, then as the lawyer said:

Quote
"prosecutorial discretion" may be exercised if people do not meet the eligibility requirements. What that means is that the prosecutor can choose to look at the facts of your case and say "Even though he doesn't meet the requirements because [i.e.fill in the blank], he meets them in every other way so therefore I am going to ignore it."
UNQUOTE

I am going to continue the research and be as much informed as possible when I decide whether to or not apply, what are your thoughts ?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#30
06-19-2012, 08:38 AM
Junior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
3 posts
karola
0 AP
I am under 30 but entered the US at age 17...therefore I do not qualify for deferred action. I think for this borderline cases legal advise is a MUST. My case for instance is somewhat unique. I not only completed HS but have a BS/MS in Electrical Engineering, currently working on my Ph.D., about to publish in conference proceedings in July, very clean resume and no criminal record...besides that I am married to a US citizen for almost two years and my husband has a i130 petition approved and a case in course.

I an EXTREMELY happy for all of you who qualify ...sadly my brother who also graduated with a BS/MS in EE was not patient and left the country in search of opportunities elsewhere about a year ago.

Please do not make a silly move just because you are desperate....make your best and hire a lawyer...we have done wrong to no one and as everyone tells me...God is there for EVERYONE...so just hang in there....things are moving in our favor...just keep out of trouble...continue studying, serve your community...and be patient!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
karola
View Public Profile
Send a private message to karola
Find all posts by karola
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.