• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

March

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The Lounge

Will I qualify? - Page 4

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
#31
06-20-2012, 09:45 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue2day View Post
Oh so then any dreamers who fall in this category is then cleared from being inadmissible under the dream act?
That is the million dollar question. According to 6c on all the DA bills, I guess it is cleared?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gsb89 View Post
What If you were never asked to file an I9 form? Or is the I9 something your employer files for you to the irs?

I-9 is a form that is kept by the employer and the employer only. If you leave the job before 3 years, it will be kept until the 3 years is reached. If you worked more then 3 years, then it is suppose to kept for 1 year after your termination.

I didn't even submit a job application for my current job. They just took me on.
With I-9?

Quote:
Originally Posted by will_con View Post
So if you lied about claiming to be a USC you can still qualify for a GC just not citizenship?
This is the million dollar question. If you find the answer, let us know.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#32
06-20-2012, 09:46 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2012
918 posts
will_con
0 AP
Basically ANYTIME you claimed to be one is unexcusable.

Yeah, even telling a friend you're a USC is supposed to bar you for life from the US. So, claiming to be one on your school docs, work docs, doctor info, voter registration, license registration, etc. is supposed to be a big deal

But, the real question is, will they catch you? Frankly, I don't think they have enough time to check all of your documentations unless you raise a pretty big red flag
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
will_con
View Public Profile
Send a private message to will_con
Find all posts by will_con
#33
06-20-2012, 09:49 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
This is a good post and makes sense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by will_con View Post
Basically ANYTIME you claimed to be one is unexcusable.

Yeah, even telling a friend you're a USC is supposed to bar you for life from the US. So, claiming to be one on your school docs, work docs, doctor info, voter registration, license registration, etc. is supposed to be a big deal

But, the real question is, will they catch you? Frankly, I don't think they have enough time to check all of your documentations unless you raise a pretty big red flag
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#34
06-20-2012, 10:11 PM
Member
Joined in Dec 2010
36 posts
ScarredFellow
0 AP
Yup my 'friend' is screwed.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
ScarredFellow
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ScarredFellow
Find all posts by ScarredFellow
#35
06-20-2012, 10:21 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2012
918 posts
will_con
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScarredFellow View Post
Yup my 'friend' is screwed.
Let's just wait, no need for your "friend" to freak out. The 2010 Dream Act excused us for using false documents. If Obama is like the Dems who drafted the bill, I think there's still hope for your "friend"
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
will_con
View Public Profile
Send a private message to will_con
Find all posts by will_con
#36
06-20-2012, 10:43 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by will_con View Post
Let's just wait, no need for your "friend" to freak out. The 2010 Dream Act excused us for using false documents. If Obama is like the Dems who drafted the bill, I think there's still hope for your "friend"

What about all the CIR bills? Was it the same rule also?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#37
06-20-2012, 11:42 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2012
918 posts
will_con
0 AP
Okay so I went back to the 2007 CIR bill

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...9tvui:e541242:

Quote:
SEC. 245B. ACCESS TO EARNED ADJUSTMENT.

`(a) Adjustment of Status-
`(1) PRINCIPAL ALIENS- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including section 244(h) of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall adjust to the status of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, an alien who satisfies the following requirements:
`(A) APPLICATION- The alien shall file an application establishing eligibility for adjustment of status and pay the fine required under subsection (m) and any additional amounts owed under that subsection.
`(B) CONTINUOUS PHYSICAL PRESENCE-
`(i) IN GENERAL- The alien shall establish that the alien--
`(I) was physically present in the United States on or before the date that is 5 years before April 5, 2006;
`(II) was not legally present in the United States on April 5, 2006, under any classification set forth in section 101(a)(15); and
`(III) did not depart from the United States during the 5-year period ending on April 5, 2006, except for brief, casual, and innocent departures.
`(ii) LEGALLY PRESENT- For purposes of this subparagraph, an alien who has violated any conditions of his or her visa shall be considered not to be legally present in the United States.
`(C) ADMISSIBLE UNDER IMMIGRATION LAWS- The alien shall establish that the alien is not inadmissible under section 212(a) except for any provision of that section that is waived under subsection (b) of this section.
And further down....

Quote:
(b) Grounds of Inadmissibility-
`(1) APPLICABLE PROVISIONS- In the determination of an alien's admissibility under paragraphs (1)(C) and (2) of subsection (a), the following provisions of section 212(a) shall apply and may not be waived by the Secretary of Homeland Security under paragraph (3)(A):
`(A) Paragraph (1) (relating to health).
`(B) Paragraph (2) (relating to criminals).
`(C) Paragraph (3) (relating to security and related grounds).
`(D) Subparagraphs (A) and (C) of paragraph (10) (relating to polygamists and child abductors).
`(2) GROUNDS OF INADMISSIBILITY NOT APPLICABLE- The provisions of paragraphs (5), (6)(A), (6)(B), (6)(C), (6)(F), (6)(G), (7), (9) (other than subparagraph (C)(i)(II)), and (10)(B) of section 212(a) shall not apply to an alien who is applying for adjustment of status under subsection (a).

So to answer your question, if you used fraudulent documentation you would have been excused under the 2007 CIR
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
will_con
View Public Profile
Send a private message to will_con
Find all posts by will_con
#38
06-21-2012, 03:14 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
1,932 posts
Feenmi's Avatar
Feenmi
290 AP
close this thread....PLEASE.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Feenmi
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Feenmi
Find all posts by Feenmi
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.