• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

April

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

US Representative Steve King Has Heated Confrontation With Dreamers - Page 3

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • next ›
  • last »
#21
08-08-2014, 01:13 PM
Junior Member
Joined in Jul 2014
28 posts
Enough
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by kabs View Post
Personally, while I agree that the way Dreamer protestors are handling this is all kinds of wrong and may create backlash, I always wonder why people talk about illegal immigration as national security issue when I have yet to see an illegal immigrant actually commit some act of terror similar to Hamas, Al Qaeda, and even the individual acts such as the Boston Marathon bombing (and that person had a green card).

Really, terrorism is well-funded and the money runs incredibly deep. You can buy your way into the U.S on a tourist visa, you can enter the U.S on a student visa with a college acceptance letter, you can get a visa for starting a business in the U.S that employs Americans. 9/11 happened and wouldn't have been stopped if the border was secure because the terrorists weren't going to enter via the border. Entering from the border is dangerous. You can get killed, eaten alive, and raped. Ain't no way a terrorist is going to go through all of that just to bomb the U.S when there are other ways.

Also, I understand why people are going to protest so that their parents can also live here. To you, they are criminals. To them, they are the people who loved them and took care of them. However angry I used to get at my mom, she did the best that she could and while she didn't know the implications of her actions (because most people aren't that knowledgeable about immigration in the first place), I wouldn't turn my back on her either.
Thank you for your civility. You are the first person on this forum to reply without animus. You are clearly a mature and intelligent person, and of the caliber most citizens would welcome and support. Sadly, you are being represented by far too many seemingly more interested in self-aggrandizement and arrogant antics than furthering your cause.

I am not here to antagonize. I thought perhaps I could offer a different perspective, and express the feelings shared by many citizens. Reading comments on this forum, it became apparent that many Dreamers have a misconception. It is automatically assumed, opposition equates to racism, xenophobia, nativism, or anti-Hispanic sentiment. Nothing could be further from the truth. Are there racist opponents? Are you hated by some? Absolutely! However, I can attest to the fact, most do not share their position.

While I vehemently oppose CIR, I support legalization for any person who entered this country as a child, and knows no other home, as long as they are not a reprobate and can contribute to this country. We already have enough criminals and parasites. We certainly don't need more. Children follow their parents. Generally, they do not have a choice. However, I believe the entry age should be lowered. I don't consider a 20-year-old who entered this country at 15, someone who "grew up" here. A person who entered as a toddler would know no other country; but, a 15-year-old would.

It is always a national security threat when foreign nationals enter without inspection. Some may have nefarious intent. We simply don't know. While it is true the 9/11 terrorists did not enter through our southern border, foreign nationals from terrorist nations have been apprehended crossing illegally from Mexico. BP has also reported many learn Spanish to portray themselves as Mexican nationals. Our enemies would be foolish not to take advantage of our porous border with Mexico, especially now. While the BP is processing children and families, drug smugglers and other miscreants have unfettered access.

If 57,000 children can traverse the dangerous terrain, surely it is possible for sophisticated terrorists. They have the means to fly close to the Rio Grande, and have transportation waiting on the U.S. side of the border. They don't have to trek across the scorching desert.

I understand why you and other Dreamers want to help your parents. However, the in-your-face arrogance is counterproductive. They aren't "asking" for help. They are "demanding." They are also demanding a seat at the negotiation table, as though they have a right to dictate U.S. laws. I am sure you can understand why such temerity would infuriate citizens. I know for a fact, the group currently protesting at the White House is losing support for your cause. Again, humility will garner far more support than arrogance. It takes gall for people who are not citizens of this country, here legally or illegally, to protest outside the White House demanding anything.

I clearly understand why you will not abandon your mom. I wouldn't either. I don't believe most would. However, your mother made a conscious decision to circumvent the law. It isn't necessary to be well-versed on U.S. immigration policies. She knew she did not have authorization to enter this country.

We can't enforce laws based on familial ties or emotion. There are thousands of citizen mothers serving time in prison for various offenses. I am sure their children would prefer to have them home. Would it be fair to pardon the parents of Dreamers, while U.S. citizens are required to pay for their crimes? I think not.

I oppose CIR because it is amnesty. We tried amnesty in 1986, and are now suffering the consequences. Amnesty only serves to incentivize illegal immigration, because it rewards lawlessness. CIR does not include punitive measures. It pardons illegal aliens for crimes such as ID theft, fraud, and tax evasion. Employers are also given a pass. A U.S. citizen would be prosecuted for such offenses.

You know yourself a SSN is required for employment in this country. Millions of citizens have had their identity stolen by illegal aliens. This wreaks havoc for the victims. Citizens have been denied unemployment benefits because illegal aliens are using their SSN to work. Others have been denied medical coverage. It also ruins good credit. The list goes on. Illegal immigration is not a victimless crime. People are suffering. It takes years to resolve problems associated with ID theft, if ever. Should the perpetrators escape punishment? They will, with the passage of CIR.


Quote:
In regards to visa overstayers, immigration law is onerous and time consuming if one wishes to live or work here. Depending on the visa class and type, there is no practical way to adjust to a green card/permanent residency unless one has a knowledgeable immigration attorney (through their company, paid for by their savings) or they received a green card through a lottery. What typically happens is that an immigration attorney takes on many cases and does not send documents within the USCIS stipulated time frame. Many of the petitions and processes have such a large backlog (years even) that the applicant may have moved, a document may need to be resent, or the immigration firm is no longer operating.

I remember one person who had a green card, had sent in an address request change to USCIS as soon as he landed in NYC (confirmed on a USCIS document), and USCIS still mailed his greencard to the old address so now he has to find the money (but meanwhile can't legally work because he needs to show a green card and USCIS has stopped issuing temporary I-551's) to get a new greencard. He technically still has permanent residency, but for those who are coming in to this country, "following USCIS rules" is not so simple and is not simply due to that person's error.

I know another person who came in on a visa that no longer exists (USCIS stopped issuing the visa in 2003/2004) and there aren't that many attorneys who are knowledgeable about how he could obtain legal status through that type since it's not common.

And this is dealing with people who have knowledgeable attorneys. We haven't begun to think about people who have spent money for attorneys who blatantly lie and take advantage of immigrants who want to do the right thing and become legal.
I do not doubt there are cases such as your examples. The ineptitude of government agencies is astounding; which is precisely why fraud and waste is rampant. Government programs lack oversight. If we had competent agencies, we would not be in this mess. CIR would be yet another failure.

While some may come with the intention of remaining compliant with the terms of their visa, others enter on visas intending to never leave. I believe we should assist those with bona fide visa issues. But, we should not reward those who came here with the intent to violate the law. A distinction must be made.


Quote:
Since you mentioned petitioning your husband as you are a U.S citizen, that is one of the more simpler/easier petition processes a person can do to become legal. While there are hoops to prove that this is a bonafide marriage, it normally takes around a year from start to finish. In fact, practically all visa overstayers could marry a U.S citizen and adjust their status that way but many choose not to because that's committing fraud. As much as people talk about criminals, this is one thing that would be a no-brainer for any smart criminal to do.

However, most people are seeking proper means of correcting their status, not knowing that falling out of status means that there is no way for them to actually adjust their status. And if you are advised by the wrong attorney after spending $$$$? Good luck.
I said I am married to a legal immigrant. However, I did not petition him. He was a naturalized citizen prior to our marriage, after being subjected to a lengthy and costly process. Understandably, he is a staunch opponent of CIR. Frankly, I would not marry a person who relied on my status to gain citizenship. I certainly would not marry a person here illegally. I am sure some marriages are based on love. But, there is also fraud. Not to mention, the number of posters on this forum contemplating marriage solely to gain legal status. That's appalling.

Quote:
As to those who enter without inspection, many people are desperate and they come in to the country to help their families. As mentioned by another poster, NAFTA decimated Mexico. The geopolitical nature of immigration is that you can't separate immigration from world issues. This is why we had waves of Jewish, Irish, and Italian immigrants coming into the U.S within the 1900s. Mexico has ALWAYS been a border country of the U.S and only within the last two decades (which coincide with NAFTA) have we seen a dramatic rise in Mexicans crossing the border. Interestingly, though the U.S presents itself as a sovereign nation, its foreign policy over the years reflects less isolationism and more pulling its political weight and influence for its own advancement. Meanwhile, countries deal with the aftermath and the U.S says "it's not us, it's you."
I understand their desperation. However, that does not justify violating our laws. If they are not working under the table, they are using a stolen or fake SSN. Even a fake SSN can be a valid number assigned to a citizen or legal immigrant. Again, it is not a victimless crime. Citizens suffer.

Quote:
Anyway, after Reagan's amnesty program and NAFTA, you have the Clinton administration passing the 10 year ban which effectively meant that for immigrants who came here illegally or overstay their visa, even if they return back to their home country, they are banned for 10 years from re-entering (legal petition and otherwise). As a result, many people stay rather than take their chances. Personally, I believe that if Clinton hadn't done that, we wouldn't see the estimated 11 million today.
I couldn't agree more. NAFTA was a huge mistake. However, there must be consequences for violating the law. Perhaps a 10-year ban is excessive, I'm not sure. I do know it can't be too difficult to return to this country illegally given the number of repeat deportees.

I don't believe there are only 11 million living here illegally. We have been told there were 10-11 million for the past decade. They estimated 800,000 prior to the 1986 amnesty. In reality there were in excess of 3 million. Therefore, I think it is safe to assume we have at least twice, if not three times as many than estimated. There may be 10 million in California alone.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Enough
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Enough
Find all posts by Enough
#22
08-08-2014, 01:17 PM
Junior Member
Joined in Jul 2014
28 posts
Enough
0 AP
I had to split my response. When I tried to post, I received a message that it exceeded the length. Sorry.

Quote:
Furthermore, I don't have the numbers, but I believe that if we looked at countries of the 3 million who received amnesty from Reagan, it would include Mexico, but not to the degree that people would expect for a border country (or even reflected by the numbers now). The reality is that the people who are coming in through the border NOW are immediately working and sending money back home. Many countries around the world have remittances as a sizeable amount of their GDP.

Which is why it is curious that people are framing the debate about citizenship when it's really about work. People want a greencard so that they can go home to their families as they wish, but if you have a travel visa and a work card... Most people would take it.
You are absolutely right. Remittances account for Mexico's #2 source of revenue. Billions are sent each month. That is money leaving this country, which creates another problem. Most of those billions would remain here to boost this economy if millions were not here illegally sending billions home. To compound the problem, millions who send monthly remittances are receiving tax-funded benefits. They use their U.S.-born children or fraud to collect. Therefore, U.S. taxpayers are supporting them while they are boosting Mexico's economy.

I have never believed the goal is citizenship. In fact, only a small percent of those with green cards ever apply for citizenship. Illegal aliens want legal status, period. The U.S. is simply a means to an end. Most are here to simply get what they can. Some will save money and return to their countries of origin to start businesses or build homes. The U.S. is being used.

Mexico's middle-class is growing by leaps and bounds, while the U.S. middle-class is being decimated, in part, due to illegal immigration. If the U.S. could dump millions of impoverished on Canada, we would also prosper, especially if our citizens send billions in remittances to boost our economy. It would be a win-win. We would not have the burden of supporting our impoverished, while we would reap the benefit from their employment in another country.


Quote:
I don't understand why Black American history was brought into this, because as I see it, while you do have refugees from civil wars receiving asylum from many countries, the majority of foreign nationals who are entering are not fleeing a similar set of oppressive laws such as Jim Crow in their home country nor are they a persecuted minority. The ebb and flow mirrors the economy of their home countries.

I've argued on this board before that I do not and will not compare the black civil rights movement or even the gay civil rights movement to the immigration reform movement because there are few and far similarities.
I used the example of Black Americans during Jim Crow simply to illustrate, with courage and resolve it is possible to improve one's life without fleeing to another country. Mexicans should fight to restore some semblance of law, and replace their corrupt government. As long as they flee to the U.S. nothing will change.

However, I do agree no valid comparison can be made between the plight of Black Americans and illegal aliens. As citizens, Black Americans had a right to protest and demand equality in this country. It is an affront to compare their plight to that of people living here illegally.

Politicians on both sides of the aisle are crooks. Neither party has the best interest of the citizens of this country at heart. They do the bidding for Wall Street, K Street, and well-funded special interest groups. If they don't care about citizens, they certainly don't care about you. We are all mere pawns. They will say and do anything to retain their cushy seats in Congress. They lack integrity. The citizens of this country should clean house.

I wish you the best, and hope you will one day realize your dream.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Enough
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Enough
Find all posts by Enough
#23
08-08-2014, 01:47 PM
Junior Member
Joined in Jul 2014
28 posts
Enough
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by engineergirl View Post
I appreciate your articulate responses, and I do not agree with the name calling and assumptions that other Dreamers have made about you, just because people don't agree with our views (hey, at least you don't sound like a hillbilly!).

Just speaking for myself here:

I do not feel entitled to anything. I am well aware that the United States is a generous nation. The United States and the citizens do not owe me anything. It's true. I, however, owe the United States a lot and I would like to be given an opportunity to give back, to prove that I love my this country as much as you love it, if not more. I would like to prove myself, and DACA has given me a chance, but of course I'd like to be able to participate in the democratic process, and travel, and lots of other things I can't do right now with DACA only. I am all alone in this country, and perhaps if my parents were here I'd want the same for them, but they're not. They did, however, lived here without documents for many years. Life as an immigrant is not easy. All non-DACA recipients want at least an opportunity to work, to pay their taxes, drive, to live without fear of separation of their families, give back. Perhaps you see it as entitlement, but I don't think it is: it's simply humane (and kind of logical if you see it from a economics perspective). The law is not perfect nor logical nor humane, and I feel sorry for those who have to wait years for their families to be united. So the goverment is the blame a little(!) as well for making it impossible to legally emigrate for some people or fix their status (thanks President Clinton!), and because the goverment agencies that handles these cases (USCIS, DHS, etc) takes foreveeeerrrrrrrr, as in up to 20 years, to process an application. A lot of these undocumented immigrants have petitions pending, it's literally now just a matter of time. I wish I could add more to it, but I would take a whole lot of room, trying to explain myself, and still wouldn't change your opinion. Have a great weekend!
Thank you for your kindness. As I explained to "kabs" my issue is not with bona fide Dreamers, who were brought here as children, and know no other home. I do not fault you. I support you. But, I cannot support CIR. Frankly, I don't know anyone who does.

Immigration "reform" should not include amnesty. It should involve streamlining our legal immigration process, granting foreign STEM graduates an opportunity to remain here, and other necessary improvements.

However, people who willfully violated our laws should not be rewarded with legalization. No country can sustain this level of unabated massive illegal immigration. Too much damage has been done. I realize massive illegal immigration has been facilitated by the U.S. government. I also realize many are here simply to work.

While I certainly feel compassion, my loyalty is to this country and the citizens who are seeing their wages depressed, businesses bankrupted, displaced jobs, crime, and destroyed neighborhoods. There are no jobs Americans won't do for a decent wage and benefits.

I also notice, unlike prior immigrants who came here with a desire to become an American, the majority of illegal aliens seem to have no such aspirations. Many refuse to assimilate, and arrogantly expect to be accommodated in Spanish. Again, the government and businesses are complicit. No other group has been so coddled. Other immigrants either learned English, or they could not survive in the country. It was sink or swim. There has never been a press 1 for English and 2 for French, Italian, German, etc.

I believe another amnesty would be the final nail in the coffin. If we reward millions again, in ten years we will have perhaps 40 million more demanding the same. Repeating the same failed policy would be national suicide. Rather than progressing, we would become a replica of the failed third-world countries illegal aliens fled. That is not what I want for my country.

Good luck! Have a great day and a wonderful weekend.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Enough
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Enough
Find all posts by Enough
#24
08-08-2014, 02:27 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2011
579 posts
Jsonkim88
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enough View Post
While I vehemently oppose CIR, I support legalization for any person who entered this country as a child, and knows no other home, as long as they are not a reprobate and can contribute to this country. We already have enough criminals and parasites. We certainly don't need more. Children follow their parents. Generally, they do not have a choice. However, I believe the entry age should be lowered. I don't consider a 20-year-old who entered this country at 15, someone who "grew up" here. A person who entered as a toddler would know no other country; but, a 15-year-old would.
Correct me if I am wrong. Isn't DREAMACT same thing as CIR? I thought the comprehensive reform focused towards legalizing children.

Likewise, I do agree with you that adults, my mother included, who came to this country illegally should not be eligible for the comprehensive reform. They made the choice of breaking the law, and should be held liable for their action. I know I am being selfish, and our parents have sacrificed much for our sake, but they made a conscious decision, and were well aware of the consequences. My mother said to me once, she will be just happy if I, alone, get legalization, because she knows that I would take care of her rest of her life.
__________________
8/16 Application Sent to Phoenix, AZ
8/17 Application Delivered
8/21 i797C's sent out for i765/i821-d
8/23 Biometrics letter received, scheduled for 09/13
9/13 Biometrics completed 10/5 -APPROVED
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Jsonkim88
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Jsonkim88
Find all posts by Jsonkim88
#25
08-08-2014, 03:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2014
139 posts
applebees121
0 AP
enough, i don't understand why you don't support CIR. Is the current CIR you oppose or you oppose any CIR? You're right, this immigration system is broken. Something needs to be done. If you're against any CIR, then you're pretty much indirectly admitting that nothing should be fixed. Do you think it's realistic to wound up all the illegal immigrants and deport them out? All 8+ million or so? That's a heavy burden on the taxpayer money and simply, impossible to do.

I came here when I was 7. My family went through the green card process. We went to the green card interview. We got denied. We appealed. Never heard back. Still technically "pending" 10+ years later. Do you know how difficult the immigration process is?

I'm pretty sure I'm not going to change your mind nor will you change mine. If you oppose this CIR, what should it be then? If you oppose any CIR, then you're basically not looking to fix this.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
applebees121
View Public Profile
Send a private message to applebees121
Find all posts by applebees121
#26
08-08-2014, 05:27 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
I kinda want to reply Enough but his post sound the same as the ones we read on Washington post. And you cannot reason with these people at all.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#27
08-08-2014, 07:02 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
512 posts
chocolatedrop's Avatar
chocolatedrop
0 AP
The problem doesn't lie with CIR,it's the solution that must be addressed in a humane matter amongst our Congressman.There is no way one huge bill will get thru congress...If both parties could stop bickering long enough to come up with a solution to this problem,we won't be here in 10 years. After all this is America one of the most capitalistic countries around where everyone feels that your dreams can come true. I don't agree that for a decent wage and benefits Americans will do those jobs, America has become dependent on cheap labor,A lot of those employers won't even seek an American worker, Why all the push for Tech workers,You honestly think its because there is a shortage of skilled labor in this country...Um I think not,but I do believe that a company would rather pay a foreign worker less than an American worker. African Americans received there rights from a Civil war in the USA nothing was giving to them,and the rest was through protest and laws being changed.
__________________
I-821D /I-765 received 9/11/12- Nebraska SC
DACA APPROVAL--12/5/12--- EAD---12/5/12
Visa Overstay.. married SameSex USC 7/2013 AOS filed 10/25/13 rcvd 11/1/13 intvw scheduled 1/8/14 Adjusted 1/8/14 GC rcvd 1/16/2014 filed N-400 4/8/2018 Naturalization intvw 12/20/18 passed
Last edited by chocolatedrop; 08-08-2014 at 09:36 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
chocolatedrop
View Public Profile
Send a private message to chocolatedrop
Find all posts by chocolatedrop
#28
08-08-2014, 07:22 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
512 posts
chocolatedrop's Avatar
chocolatedrop
0 AP
[quote=Pianoswithoutfaith;537398]I kinda want to reply Enough but his post sound the same as the ones we read on Washington post. And you cannot reason with these people at all.[/QUOTE

It's not about these people,These people are Americans who feel that they are being bombarded by foreigners,they same way they feel about Blacks,Gays and anything else that doesn't conform to this white anglo nation called America,they all forget that there ancestors immigrated here.If the right group gets upset over this Steve King fiasco no body is going to touch immigration no matter who gets unseated in congress!! Its more of Enough's out there that can begin to raise all types of problems for the undocumented. CIR is an issue like no other, how do you begin to send 11million + back home? You can't you come up with a solution that can be carried out and implemented. Enough has a heart when it comes to DREAMERS as do most americans,but the truth of the matter is no other country would even care that much about a DREAMER or undocumented adults they would be shipped back home ASAP ..
__________________
I-821D /I-765 received 9/11/12- Nebraska SC
DACA APPROVAL--12/5/12--- EAD---12/5/12
Visa Overstay.. married SameSex USC 7/2013 AOS filed 10/25/13 rcvd 11/1/13 intvw scheduled 1/8/14 Adjusted 1/8/14 GC rcvd 1/16/2014 filed N-400 4/8/2018 Naturalization intvw 12/20/18 passed
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
chocolatedrop
View Public Profile
Send a private message to chocolatedrop
Find all posts by chocolatedrop
#29
08-08-2014, 07:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
And is what makes the US different from those countries.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#30
08-08-2014, 09:38 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
512 posts
chocolatedrop's Avatar
chocolatedrop
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianoswithoutfaith View Post
And is what makes the US different from those countries.
Yes it does " God Bless America"
__________________
I-821D /I-765 received 9/11/12- Nebraska SC
DACA APPROVAL--12/5/12--- EAD---12/5/12
Visa Overstay.. married SameSex USC 7/2013 AOS filed 10/25/13 rcvd 11/1/13 intvw scheduled 1/8/14 Adjusted 1/8/14 GC rcvd 1/16/2014 filed N-400 4/8/2018 Naturalization intvw 12/20/18 passed
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
chocolatedrop
View Public Profile
Send a private message to chocolatedrop
Find all posts by chocolatedrop
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • next ›
  • last »


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.