• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

April

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., is proposing legislation already referred to as “the conser

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›
  • last »
#1
09-01-2017, 12:57 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2014
511 posts
Vze77ach
0 AP
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/pol...170547852.html

WASHINGTON
Conservative lawmakers led by Thom Tillis are crafting a bill they call the conservative Dream Act that would provide a path to permanent residency to people brought here illegally as children, offering President Donald Trump an escape hatch on one of his most vexing immigration challenges.
The legislation creates an avenue for Trump to both fulfill a campaign promise to end an Obama-era program known as DACA while yielding to what appears to be his personal desire to let these immigrants remain in the country.
“Who cares about DACA if there's a Dream Act,” said a Republican involved with the policy negotiations and aware of Tillis’ plan

Like Curbelo’s bill, the Tillis plan would offer an eventual path to U.S. citizenship for immigrants who entered illegally before Jan. 1, 2012, and were 16 years old or younger.
The proposal would grant high school graduates without a serious criminal record conditional immigration status for a five-year period. During that time, if they earn a higher-education degree, serve in the military or stay employed, they could apply for permanent residency and, eventually, citizenship.
About 2.5 million Dreamers would be eligible.
“It really is the conservative dreamer bill,” said a congressional source familiar with the plan.
A spokesman for Tillis, Daniel Keylin, confirmed that the North Carolina Senators is working with Republican colleagues on “fair, but rigorous” legislation that will address “the long-term uncertainty facing undocumented minors.”
“Regardless of the policy itself, DACA is an executive overreach that sets immigration policy through executive order instead of the proper channel – Congress,” Keylin said. “It’s highly unlikely that DACA will survive a legal challenge, and it’s the responsibility of Congress, not the President, to offer a long-term legislative fix.”
Immigration advocates have sought to pass the bill for more than a decade, but members of Congress have never been able to get enough support to pass the measure.
Packaging the proposal as a Republican plan, which has more stringent requirements, supporters expect Tillis’ plan will have a much better chance of passing than past bipartisan proposals that have failed.
A Republican involved with the policy negotiations and aware of Tillis’ conversation with the White House said the North Carolina senator’s proposal would allow Trump to be rid of the DACA program and still call it a win.
Groups that have opposed protecting Dreamers acknowledge a legislative proposal would make things easier for Trump to end the DACA.
“A legislative Dream Act would supplant the need for DACA. It wouldn't be an issue at all,” said Ira Mehlman, a spokesman with the Federation for American Immigration Reform, a group that is in talks with the administration.
The bill will receive push back. Curbelo drew opposition from United We Dream, a youth-led immigrant advocacy organization that called the bill a “symbolic” gesture to try to score political points in an election year. But other pro-immigration reform groups, including the conservative National Immigration Forum, supported it.
In February, Trump promised to treat the so-called Dreamers “with heart.” But Trump has watched his poll numbers plummet amid multiple scandals and failed legislative initiatives that have besieged his young presidency.
Citing the poll numbers, Chris Chmielenski, NumbersUSA’s director of content and activism, said Trump needs to do everything he can to hang on to the support of his base.
“His base is the only thing he has going for him right now,” Chmielenski said. “And this would appease his base.”
Last month, aboard Air Force One en route to Paris, Trump acknowledged he was still agonizing over what to do.
“It's a decision that I make and it's a decision that's very, very hard to make,” Trump said. “I really understand the situation now. I understand the situation very well. What I’d like to do is a comprehensive immigration plan. But our country and political forces are not ready yet.”
Tillis has shown deep interest in immigration policy. He placed a “hold” on one of Trump’s nominees for the Department of Homeland Security in July in an effort to pressure the department to approve more visas for guest workers. He removed the hold on Lee Francis Cessna to be director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services after DHS and then-Sec. John Kelly approved an additional 15,000 visas for workers who aid North Carolina’s landscaping, tourism and seafood-production industries.
“He wants to find as many bipartisan solutions as he can. He thinks those are wins for him personally and politically,” said Garret Ventry, a D.C.-based Republican strategist and a former communications director at the North Carolina legislature. “North Carolina is moving to the center. It isn’t going to the right like places like Wisconsin are.”
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Vze77ach
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Vze77ach
Find all posts by Vze77ach
#2
09-01-2017, 01:04 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
1,544 posts
versailles's Avatar
versailles
0 AP
would we be able to travel with this?
if so, i'm all for it.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
versailles
View Public Profile
Send a private message to versailles
Find all posts by versailles
#3
09-01-2017, 01:06 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
115 posts
cp120
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by versailles View Post
would we be able to travel with this?
if so, i'm all for it.
Honestly I just want to be able to work and don't let me degree go to waste. We can't be that picky.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
cp120
View Public Profile
Send a private message to cp120
Find all posts by cp120
#4
09-01-2017, 01:06 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2014
511 posts
Vze77ach
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by versailles View Post
would we be able to travel with this?
if so, i'm all for it.
It will be similar to RACA act, but with more stringent requirement !
I am all for it as well !
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Vze77ach
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Vze77ach
Find all posts by Vze77ach
#5
09-01-2017, 01:07 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
1,479 posts
ceaguila
0 AP
Sounds good, there's so many options now..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
ceaguila
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ceaguila
Find all posts by ceaguila
#6
09-01-2017, 01:07 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2006
3,111 posts
VJB2's Avatar
VJB2
0 AP
Quote:
Like Curbelo’s bill, the Tillis plan would offer an eventual path to U.S. citizenship for immigrants who entered illegally before Jan. 1, 2012, and were 16 years old or younger.
Were 16 or younger on that date or entered before that date and were 16 or younger at the time of entry? If it’s the first, I am aged out. I was 25-26 in 2012.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
VJB2
View Public Profile
Send a private message to VJB2
Find all posts by VJB2
#7
09-01-2017, 01:09 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2014
511 posts
Vze77ach
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by VJB2 View Post
Were 16 or younger on that date or entered before that date and were 16 or younger at the time of entry? If it’s the first, I am aged out. I was 25-26 in 2012.
I think it mean you must entered US illegally before Jan 1st, 2012, must be 16 yrs old or younger at the time of entry
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Vze77ach
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Vze77ach
Find all posts by Vze77ach
#8
09-01-2017, 01:14 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2016
3,631 posts
eva02's Avatar
eva02
0 AP
United We Dream does. Not want us to have legal status lol
__________________
Expiration: 04/09/2020
Renewal Accepted: 02/05/2019
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
eva02
View Public Profile
Send a private message to eva02
Find all posts by eva02
#9
09-01-2017, 01:17 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
0 AP
If UWD is being unreasonable, all of you need to start contacting the leaders. It's not cool.
__________________
#Lawgic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
#10
09-01-2017, 01:19 AM
Member
Joined in Sep 2010
69 posts
Fifty_
0 AP
I'll take it!

Yeah we can't get too picky with these things
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Fifty_
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Fifty_
Find all posts by Fifty_
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›
  • last »


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.