• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The Lounge

PROPOSAL - Page 4

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 14
  • next ›
  • last »
#31
10-26-2007, 03:58 AM
Senior Member
From Nyc
Joined in Sep 2007
422 posts
ibrahim
ibrahim
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ibrahim
Find all posts by ibrahim
0 AP
i just mandatory military service i guess they wanna see if we are really patriotic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#32
10-26-2007, 09:52 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2007
613 posts
8-bitPanda
8-bitPanda
View Public Profile
Find all posts by 8-bitPanda
0 AP
How does absolutely no financial aid or work study sound?

Oh yea, and to keep reaplying for the visa we must have completed the requirements of community service, college/military in the first five years without any exceptions.

Touchback maybe? Although I really don't like the idea.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#33
10-26-2007, 10:04 AM
Senior Member
From Houston, TX
Joined in Sep 2007
1,975 posts
pingpong abyss's Avatar
pingpong abyss
pingpong abyss
View Public Profile
Send a private message to pingpong abyss
Visit pingpong abyss's homepage!
Find all posts by pingpong abyss
0 AP
So take away any kind of monetary help, up the college requirements, and limit the time period? Yeah, I'd like to see some people actually qualify for Dream.

Touchback might not be so bad, but that depends on what country you're from. Some people can't go back at all.
__________________
The Pingpong of the Abyss
A Dream Deferred
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#34
10-26-2007, 10:33 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2006
3,617 posts
lilbawler2001's Avatar
lilbawler2001
lilbawler2001
View Public Profile
Send a private message to lilbawler2001
Find all posts by lilbawler2001
50 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedream
Quote:
Originally Posted by greentea
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedream
let me add that i don't believe those changes alone would be enough to get the needed support. we'd either need to have some more drastic changes that most of us would not like. And/or we need to do something outside of amending the bill in order to get support some other way. I'm not sure what those ways are, but I do know that we have a lot of work to do to get dream passed.

let us not get lazy.
take it up a notch..

a. lower age that came here to 14.
b. valid transcript from High School (they make a phonecall where we graduated)
c. a job sponsor or a institute
d. citizenship is not obtainable
b,c, and d are acceptable.
i'm not touching age limit though. That one's just too controversial/delicate.
for instance, if you do that, lilbawler doesn't qualify anymore.
i don't even like the 30 age limit. I'd rather it be at least 35.
I love you(no homo) . No one has any objection to the 15 year or younger entry age so i'd advise we don't touch it. If anybody touches it i'll be joining alicrap. j/k
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#35
10-26-2007, 10:41 AM
Junior Member
Joined in Oct 2007
19 posts
adopt4passports
adopt4passports
View Public Profile
Send a private message to adopt4passports
Find all posts by adopt4passports
0 AP
As a citizen born in the US from 2 us parents... (my adopted hispanic daughters call us "gringo pradres".. that's why I used that term)

I am fighting for the DREAM ACT for all the KIDS who had NO choice. ... but your partents did.
NO LAW BREAKERS should be able to get visa's or greencards or citizenship.. and unfortunalty, most of the parents who brought you here are law breakers.
Since you were minors and did not make the decision to come here.. you are not law breakers.

Come here before 15, graduate, go to some college, don't break the law once... then you should be able to stay here legally. WE WANT YOUR TYPE!!

But those failouts, law breaking, losers (illegal or us citizens...) kick them out!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#36
10-26-2007, 10:43 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2007
805 posts
Mbluparadise's Avatar
Mbluparadise
Mbluparadise
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Mbluparadise
Find all posts by Mbluparadise
0 AP
adopt4... I agree with you... DREAM is understandble the way it stands now.... maybe not too permeable...
... but the problem is not the bill itself...
__________________
Please watch and support my documentary! https://vimeo.com/56403953

Run towards your fears. On the other side of your greatest fears lives your greatest life.
-Robin Sharma
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#37
10-26-2007, 11:00 AM
BANNED
Joined in Sep 2007
724 posts
quaker
quaker
View Public Profile
Find all posts by quaker
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbluparadise
adopt4... I agree with you... DREAM is understandble the way it stands now.... maybe not too permeable...
... but the problem is not the bill itself...
Exactly!

This bill as it is right now was never given a chance by half of those who opposed it/us. No matter how we change the language, those who oppose us/it will still view it under the same guise of amnesty.

If you were listening to the comments yesterday you would have noticed that not one point was raised specifically against dream.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#38
10-26-2007, 11:02 AM
Member
From Berkeley, CA
Joined in Jul 2007
51 posts
triton
triton
View Public Profile
Send a private message to triton
Find all posts by triton
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by quaker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbluparadise
adopt4... I agree with you... DREAM is understandble the way it stands now.... maybe not too permeable...
... but the problem is not the bill itself...
Exactly!

This bill as it is right now was never given a chance by half of those who opposed it/us. No matter how we change the language, those who oppose us/it will still view it under the same guise of amnesty.

If you were listening to the comments yesterday you would have noticed that not one point was raised specifically against dream.
But it might at least appease some of the senators that aren't racist hicks.

I think I'd also die if we couldn't get financial aid because I want to go to law school. It's hard enough for people that are legal to pay for their education. Maybe we can eliminate financial aid for undergrad only.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#39
10-26-2007, 12:03 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
350 posts
MrsMom
MrsMom
View Public Profile
Send a private message to MrsMom
Find all posts by MrsMom
0 AP
I think while some changes - particularly permenent legal residency as oppossed to citizenship - and community service and/or a fine - might benefit the public image some -- I think you need to be careful that you aren't going to carve out so narrow a bill that it covers a very small handfull of people. That would seem to defeat the entire principle of DREAM. If you carve it down to where only the people who have either a huge very large of family/financial support and/or are the exceptionally intelligent/determined individuals you guys are.........well I think you would be missing the point. For example - needing to have a masters degree ? how realistic is that for most people - not just DREAM people, but anyone ?

Also I think you might do well to look at what is happening with the childrens health care bills right now...... tons of compromises, lots of groveling, lots of lies and misinformation put out by the people against it ---- and still it doesn't get an override. And that is a much more popular measure. Or virtually any other measure put out in the last 5 years. Dems put out something modest - the fanatics on the right lie and distort to get their base riled up and mislead the majority who don't pay attention - dems are polite - get steamrolled - try to compromise - more steamrolling - the end. We know about the lies put out about DREAM because it is what we care about. Most people don't.

I think there are solid, strong reasons why conservatives, liberals and moderates would support the basics of DREAM - they just didn't hear them over the noise of the fanatics.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#40
10-26-2007, 01:14 PM
Junior Member
Joined in Jun 2007
27 posts
keeponhoping87
keeponhoping87
View Public Profile
Send a private message to keeponhoping87
Find all posts by keeponhoping87
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by h3wlett
REVO-FUCKING-LUTION.

It IS possible.
Revolution! Seriously! Let's do it, guys! We're a massive group of people! Calling wont help! Let's all march up to DC! They can't stop us if we're thousands, millions, and we stick together.

That will never happen though, as many are scared to death. It's sad really.

But we should do more than just calling =/ Lets like... starve in front of Congress or some shit... threaten to kill ourselves, wear shirts that say "A Message to the World: The US treats us like slaves, and each day we fear for our lives and dreams. Is this democracy?" just to ruin their reputation around the world a bit more, so maybe they'll shit their pants, and finally do a thing about us!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 14
  • next ›
  • last »


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.