• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Finally, a bipartisan deal to help the "Dreamers" - Page 4

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 14
  • 24
  • 34
  • next ›
  • last »
#31
12-05-2022, 05:01 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
124 posts
ralsingh
ralsingh
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ralsingh
Find all posts by ralsingh
0 AP
News is spreading. RollCall has an article on it -https://rollcall.com/2022/12/05/senators-pitch-deal-to-protect-dreamers-boost-border-security/.

Key points:

- And it comes during the lame-duck session that advocates and lawmakers say is likely the last opportunity to pass immigration legislation...

- The agreement would legalize undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children who face uncertain futures in the U.S. amid legal challenges to the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program

- lawmakers are considering other elements that could bring them on board — including an extension to Title 42 pandemic-era border expulsions and additional detention beds

-Immigrant advocates, however, warned they would not support an agreement that banned asylum completely.

- Any agreement would likely need to be attached to an omnibus spending agreement or continuous funding resolution rather than moving as a standalone bill.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#32
12-05-2022, 05:15 PM
Moderator
From Atlanta, GA
Joined in Aug 2008
2,822 posts
freshh.'s Avatar
freshh.
freshh.
View Public Profile
Send a private message to freshh.
Find all posts by freshh.
250 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imthexman View Post
According to Univision, the proposal is for 6 - 7 million people including Dreamers and tps. Also pro immigrant groups plan to travel to Washington for a rally on 12/15, I wish these fakers could stay away for a change, I think rallies do more damage than good, puts spotlight on the undecided gop senators and might make back down.

https://www.univision.com/noticias/i...rma-migratoria
I doubt that number is accurate. That's half of the undocumented population. But of course, we will need to see the text of the bill before confirming.

I think by the end of this, the 2 million figure may actually be much lower.
__________________
Self-Prepared, Jamaican, Visa Overstay ; Expiration: 10.18.18
Renewal #3 Sent: 01.21.18 (Chicago, IL)| Arrived: 01.23.2018
G-1145:01.26.18|Biometrics Received: 01.30.18 (02.16.18 ) | Biometrics Completed : 02.16.18
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#33
12-05-2022, 05:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2013
1,558 posts
Sorrybrah
Sorrybrah
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Sorrybrah
Find all posts by Sorrybrah
0 AP
2010 feeling all over again
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#34
12-05-2022, 06:04 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2018
1,239 posts
hDreamer1988
hDreamer1988
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hDreamer1988
Find all posts by hDreamer1988
0 AP
Quote:
-Immigrant advocates, however, warned they would not support an agreement that banned asylum completely.
They need to shut the hell up and stay out of the talks. Most of them are US citizens and have no skin in the game.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#35
12-05-2022, 06:07 PM
Senior Member
From Connecticut
Joined in Mar 2009
8,670 posts
2Face's Avatar
2Face
2Face
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2Face
Find all posts by 2Face
0 AP
A deal could potentially be reached at the eleventh hour it seems. We're headed right down to the wire here on what promises to be a chaotic end to the year. I do believe this is the best opportunity in months/years to get a concrete bipartisan permanent solution for Dreamers while strengthening the southern border. And that too it has come from the most unlikely source, Blue Dog Sinema and GOP rockstar Thom Tillis. It is now that we must shun the far left radicals who have been profiting off of immigrant fear and far right crazies and strike a massive compromise.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#36
12-05-2022, 06:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
124 posts
ralsingh
ralsingh
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ralsingh
Find all posts by ralsingh
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by hDreamer1988 View Post
They need to shut the hell up and stay out of the talks. Most of them are US citizens and have no skin in the game.
LOL, agreed.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#37
12-05-2022, 06:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2010
1,103 posts
Marco956's Avatar
Marco956
Marco956
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Marco956
Find all posts by Marco956
0 AP
Fuck man why are they getting our hopes up again?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#38
12-05-2022, 06:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2018
1,239 posts
hDreamer1988
hDreamer1988
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hDreamer1988
Find all posts by hDreamer1988
0 AP
Quote:
Immigrant advocates, however, warned they would not support an agreement that banned asylum completely. Under U.S. immigration law, migrants have the right to seek asylum at the country’s borders — though those rights have been paused for many migrants for more than two years under Title 42.

Sergio Gonzalez, executive director of the advocacy group Immigration Hub, said his organization was “deeply concerned” by some measures under consideration.

“We are greatly troubled by the inclusion of mandatory detention, the expansion of Title 42, and the harsh penalties for those who miss an asylum hearing,” Gonzalez said in a news release. “We recognize that any bipartisan process is likely to include measures we would not support on their own, but we call on Senators to fashion a final proposal that gets the balance right.”
They are already trying to kill the deal so their cash cows continue to feed them
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#39
12-05-2022, 06:14 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
319 posts
Imthexman's Avatar
Imthexman
Imthexman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Imthexman
Find all posts by Imthexman
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by ralsingh View Post
LOL, agreed.
I think this is the only item we ALL agree here.

This needs to be kept low profile imo, I can see fox news radio telling people to call their congressman to oppose this bill as soon as they find out about it, and these "pro immigration" groups make nothing but noise and wake up the opposition
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#40
12-05-2022, 06:46 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2013
1,558 posts
Sorrybrah
Sorrybrah
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Sorrybrah
Find all posts by Sorrybrah
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by hDreamer1988 View Post
They are already trying to kill the deal so their cash cows continue to feed them
Lol but when there isn't any proposal they tend to quiet??
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 14
  • 24
  • 34
  • next ›
  • last »


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.