• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

December

  »
S M T W T F S
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The Lounge

Democrats Admit Were Pawns

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
#1
01-05-2012, 12:17 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2009
105 posts
king kong
0 AP
http://blogs.westword.com/latestword...immigrants.php


So they admit it. No DREAM till 2013 and only if the Dems win. They didn't want this to pass because they can now leverage immigrant votes for their win in 2012. So here's a kicker for you thinkers out there. Obama has a HUGE agenda of unfulfilled promises. DREAM is a controversial and very alienating stand point, and for him to try'n pass it in 2013 could mean no other compromises for the remainder of his second term so i wouldn't be surprised if he once again played politics with his votes and waited till his 2nd term lame duck session to actually help those who have been giving him his damn lead in any polls. Basically hes gonna pull a BUSH wait till its to late then blame the other side once again.

It would be nice if we could somehow punish these politicians but the fact is "damned if we do damned if we dont".
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
king kong
View Public Profile
Send a private message to king kong
Find all posts by king kong
#2
01-05-2012, 01:28 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
124 posts
dexterchach
0 AP
i didn't see anything about "No DREAM till 2013 and only if the Dems win" in that article. ??
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dexterchach
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dexterchach
#3
01-05-2012, 01:40 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2010
204 posts
live4dream
0 AP
"No DREAM till 2013" that's for sure. There is going to be no DA/CIR in 2012. 1) Its a controversial issue. 2) Dems are going to use this issue to bag Latino voters to win presidential election. 3) We just don't have any votes in the congress to pass it. Only hope we might have is some sort of state wide relief. I am from NY and really do hope something positive happens here soon.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
live4dream
View Public Profile
Send a private message to live4dream
Find all posts by live4dream
#4
01-05-2012, 01:49 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by king kong View Post
http://blogs.westword.com/latestword...immigrants.php


So they admit it. No DREAM till 2013 and only if the Dems win. They didn't want this to pass because they can now leverage immigrant votes for their win in 2012. So here's a kicker for you thinkers out there. Obama has a HUGE agenda of unfulfilled promises. DREAM is a controversial and very alienating stand point, and for him to try'n pass it in 2013 could mean no other compromises for the remainder of his second term so i wouldn't be surprised if he once again played politics with his votes and waited till his 2nd term lame duck session to actually help those who have been giving him his damn lead in any polls. Basically hes gonna pull a BUSH wait till its to late then blame the other side once again.

It would be nice if we could somehow punish these politicians but the fact is "damned if we do damned if we dont".
Dude,

Are you drunk? Everything you just said has nothing to do with the article you posted.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
#5
01-05-2012, 03:00 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
1,204 posts
CB124
20 AP
I don't get it. I read the article. Everyone says there is no way he can beat Obama,and the latino vote is the most important thing in electoral politics. So what is there to worry about?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
CB124
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CB124
Find all posts by CB124
#6
01-05-2012, 03:11 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2007
311 posts
saint seiya
0 AP
There is no way in hell that the dream act or CIR could pass in 2012. Obama cannot do anything that would jeopardize votes for the remainder of the year. If Obama wins his 2nd term I feel that he will have the chance to pass the dream act, i mean hes got nothing to lose after that so...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
saint seiya
View Public Profile
Send a private message to saint seiya
Find all posts by saint seiya
#7
01-05-2012, 03:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2010
1,367 posts
Task_1539's Avatar
Task_1539
0 AP
lol, I get on curious about whats been happening, then I see this. Eh, oh well. I'm leaving come graduation.
__________________
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Task_1539
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Task_1539
Find all posts by Task_1539
#8
01-05-2012, 04:11 PM
Member
Joined in Jan 2010
90 posts
oscarg
0 AP
This is not a news article; it is a blog article and therefore most likely biased.
My biased opinion: no republican is going to ever help us. Thus, we should all vote for Obama once more; at least he doesn't explicitly say he wants to throw us all out (even though he's doing it behind the scenes)...a massive organized deportation would get too much media attention.
I hate to say it, but Obama is more on our side than any Republican.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
oscarg
View Public Profile
Send a private message to oscarg
Find all posts by oscarg
#9
01-05-2012, 04:26 PM
Senior Member
From College Station
Joined in Jul 2008
1,115 posts
Erik1421's Avatar
Erik1421
0 AP
Completely agree, blogs aren't a reliable source of news, therefore admins should move this to the lounge. Here is a quote from Rep. Barney Frank: "We are not perfect, BUT THEY'RE NUTS!"

Also, the title is missing a pronoun somewhere, which is annoying as hell
Last edited by Erik1421; 01-05-2012 at 04:29 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Erik1421
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Erik1421
Find all posts by Erik1421
#10
01-05-2012, 05:21 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2009
1,372 posts
dreamy14
240 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik1421 View Post
Also, the title is missing a pronoun somewhere, which is annoying as hell
^^ or an apostrophe.

W-E-R-E = past tense for "are"
W-E-'(apostrophe)-R-E = we are/were
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamy14
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamy14
Find all posts by dreamy14
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.