• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

December

  »
S M T W T F S
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The Lounge

Ross Fired my cousin! - Page 2

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
#11
07-07-2013, 08:06 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
114 posts
anaananata
0 AP
that manager doesnt know anything.
__________________
App Received: 08/29
Last edited by anaananata; 07-07-2013 at 08:08 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
anaananata
View Public Profile
Send a private message to anaananata
Find all posts by anaananata
#12
07-07-2013, 08:13 PM
BANNED
Joined in Oct 2012
2,487 posts
Happyman0607
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasDreamy View Post
Oh so she didn't work? That's fine then.

Anyway, it's perfectly legal for them to fire/refuse to hire her based on her immigration status as our particular status isn't protected against that (iirc).
Actually it's illegal to fire someone because of their status, it says it on the USCIS site and to call and report it if discrimination is occurring where are you getting your infro from miss?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Happyman0607
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Happyman0607
#13
07-07-2013, 09:01 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2012
459 posts
Dark Apotheosis
0 AP
I researched this issue some months ago. Some people suggested that the thread be stickied. I think it should.

http://dreamact.info/forum/showthread.php?t=37048

Pretty much: non-immigrant aliens are not protected against discrimination under the law. An employer can refuse you employment because your authorization is not permanent.

We are protected against all other types of discrimination, though -- racial, ethnic, religious, etc.
__________________
8/16 DACA packet sent from CA to Phoenix Lockbox || 8/18 Packet arrived at destination || 8/20 Case received by Nebraska Service Center || 8/27 I-797C received || 9/01 Biometrics appointment received || 9/17 Biometrics done || 10/3 EAD/DACA approved || 10/9 EAD Received
Last edited by Dark Apotheosis; 07-07-2013 at 09:05 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Dark Apotheosis
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Dark Apotheosis
Find all posts by Dark Apotheosis
#14
07-07-2013, 09:44 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2013
819 posts
Tonyhasadream's Avatar
Tonyhasadream
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Apotheosis View Post
I researched this issue some months ago. Some people suggested that the thread be stickied. I think it should.

http://dreamact.info/forum/showthread.php?t=37048

Pretty much: non-immigrant aliens are not protected against discrimination under the law. An employer can refuse you employment because your authorization is not permanent.

We are protected against all other types of discrimination, though -- racial, ethnic, religious, etc.
Damn dude it's Sunday, leave the bad news for Monday.
__________________
Delivered to Nebraska: 3/19
Biometrics appointment date: 4/24 no walk in.
RFE: 3/25/2014
RFE received: 4/10/2014
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Tonyhasadream
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Tonyhasadream
Find all posts by Tonyhasadream
#15
07-07-2013, 10:09 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
1,675 posts
TexasDreamy
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happyman0607 View Post
Actually it's illegal to fire someone because of their status, it says it on the USCIS site and to call and report it if discrimination is occurring where are you getting your infro from miss?
(Mister)

Anyway, look here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by USCIS
Employers must not discriminate with respect to hiring, firing or recruitment or referral for a fee against individuals because they are or are not U.S. citizens or because of their immigration status or type of employment authorization
Who is protected:

Quote:
U.S. citizens, recent permanent residents, asylees and refugees
Note that we are neither USC, LPR, asylees, or refugees.

Look at the "Who is protected?" column following all other types of discrimination other than the immigration status column -- they all have this text:

Quote:
All employment-authorized individuals
IANAL, but my reading of this is that employers may refuse to hire you because you don't have the right kind of immigration status.
__________________
Renewal 3: Card: Jun/19
Awaiting GC/USC...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
TexasDreamy
View Public Profile
Send a private message to TexasDreamy
Find all posts by TexasDreamy
#16
07-08-2013, 11:23 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2013
1,014 posts
TexanJose's Avatar
TexanJose
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by eric_prec View Post
Heres the Background story:
http://dreamact.info/forum/showthread.php?t=58276

So basically she got a letter today that she was fired and that she was employed for a week even though she never really went to work because the manager told her she needed to show a visa and wouldn't accept the EAD card as proof to legally work. Is there anything she can do? After the manager told her she needed a visa she got a bad vibe and simply decided not to work there which is why she didn't go back and complain. Will the firing stay in her record? They even sent her a check with $0 and the dates of employment.
First, contact the EEOC because she WAS discriminated because of her legal status, and don't worry about the record, worst-case scenario she has to explain that Ross discriminated her for not being a USC or LPR. Again, TALK TO THE EEOC, nobody else can help.
__________________
Original: App. Received by USCIS: 04/15/2013 - Approvals: i821d 04/14/2014 & i765 04/17/2014
Renewal: Received by USCIS on 11/25/2015 - ASC on 12/23/2015 - Approved
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
TexanJose
View Public Profile
Send a private message to TexanJose
Find all posts by TexanJose
#17
07-08-2013, 11:48 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2013
1,014 posts
TexanJose's Avatar
TexanJose
0 AP
Quote:
Citizenship Discrimination & Workplace Laws
The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA) makes it illegal for an employer to discriminate with respect to hiring, firing, or recruitment or referral for a fee, based upon an individual's citizenship or immigration status. The law prohibits employers from hiring only U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents unless required to do so by law, regulation or government contract. Employers may not refuse to accept lawful documentation that establishes the employment eligibility of an employee, or demand additional documentation beyond what is legally required, when verifying employment eligibility (i.e., completing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Form I-9), based on the employee's national origin or citizenship status. It is the employee's choice which of the acceptable Form I-9 documents to show to verify employment eligibility.

IRCA also prohibits retaliation against individuals for asserting their rights under the Act, or for filing a charge or assisting in an investigation or proceeding under IRCA.

IRCA’s nondiscrimination requirements are enforced by the Department of Justice’s Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC), Civil Rights Division. OSC may be reached at:

1-800-255-7688 (voice for employees/applicants),
1-800-237-2515 (TTY for employees/applicants),
1-800-255-8155 (voice for employers), or
1-800-362-2735 (TTY for employers), or
http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/osc.
From the EEOC website.
__________________
Original: App. Received by USCIS: 04/15/2013 - Approvals: i821d 04/14/2014 & i765 04/17/2014
Renewal: Received by USCIS on 11/25/2015 - ASC on 12/23/2015 - Approved
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
TexanJose
View Public Profile
Send a private message to TexanJose
Find all posts by TexanJose
#18
07-08-2013, 01:30 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2012
419 posts
eRkah
0 AP
As per USCIS's own guidelines for Employers regarding DACA:

Quote:
If a deferred action recipient presents an unexpired EAD to complete the Form I-9, an employer should accept it. The card must reasonably appear to be genuine and relate to the deferred action recipient presenting it. The information will appear as indicated on the card (as indicated on the image on the right).

The employer must comply with Form I-9 instructions and enter the document title, number, and expiration date in Section 2 under List A. The employer may not request that the employee provide additional proof that his or her case has been deferred or that he or she is authorized to work.
So I think there is discrimination going on here. I don't think your cousin should sue just yet however. She should request a letter explaining why she was fired. And most importantly, she should first try to escalate the issue with the company's corporate HR office. Most large companies have these offices with better-trained individuals. She should warn them that she will file for discrimination if they ignore her complaint.
__________________
AOS
PD: 3/20/17 | BIO: 4/19/17 | EAD: 7/12/18
INT: 3/15/18
APRV i-130 - i-485: 4/28/18
GC: 5/4/18
Last edited by eRkah; 07-08-2013 at 01:33 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
eRkah
View Public Profile
Send a private message to eRkah
Find all posts by eRkah
#19
07-08-2013, 02:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2013
1,014 posts
TexanJose's Avatar
TexanJose
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by eRkah View Post
As per USCIS's own guidelines for Employers regarding DACA:



So I think there is discrimination going on here. I don't think your cousin should sue just yet however. She should request a letter explaining why she was fired. And most importantly, she should first try to escalate the issue with the company's corporate HR office. Most large companies have these offices with better-trained individuals. She should warn them that she will file for discrimination if they ignore her complaint.
She should file a complaint, not only for her but for the rest of us. Maybe EEOC will make sure that all companies understand that DACA is like another work permit.
__________________
Original: App. Received by USCIS: 04/15/2013 - Approvals: i821d 04/14/2014 & i765 04/17/2014
Renewal: Received by USCIS on 11/25/2015 - ASC on 12/23/2015 - Approved
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
TexanJose
View Public Profile
Send a private message to TexanJose
Find all posts by TexanJose
#20
07-08-2013, 02:44 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
5,714 posts
IamAman's Avatar
IamAman
0 AP
She doesn't have a green card. She's only got her EAD by the grace of god because of the mercy of the President and an upcoming election and you guys want her to go to the news?

Here is what she should do: Pick up a stick and throw it. Chances are it will hit another crappy retailer where she can make minimum wage. Move on.
__________________
Late 40's Dreamer (Holy Fucking shit I'm almost 50 and still dealing with this), aged out of original DACA and didn't have a chance to apply for extended DACA after Republicans killed it on the vine.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IamAman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IamAman
Find all posts by IamAman
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.