• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

The President Speach & a Q&A on CIR - Page 2

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
#11
07-01-2010, 11:52 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2010
1,064 posts
eddy
eddy
View Public Profile
Send a private message to eddy
Find all posts by eddy
0 AP
It's time we bribe a few republicans...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#12
07-01-2010, 11:52 PM
Senior Member
From Minnesota
Joined in Nov 2009
5,989 posts
Demise's Avatar
Demise
Demise
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Demise
Find all posts by Demise
0 AP
I just want some action, opening debates and scheduling votes, not the constant bullshit and petting repubs on their stupid heads
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#13
07-02-2010, 12:07 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2008
198 posts
Bluestar
Bluestar
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Bluestar
Find all posts by Bluestar
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dado123 View Post
Comments appreciated, but this is how the Senate passed w/out any Republican vote:

QT>>>>>>>
Reid: Dems will use 50-vote tactic to finish healthcare in 60 days
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...within-60-days
UNQT>>>>>>>

why can CIR not be passed within same vain ?
Well this is i think what happened in the case of health care reform ( correct if i am wrong ).

Senate passed their version of the bill with 60 votes. House also passed their version with majority votes.

Then the bills went to be merged and compromised. But Brown won the senate race. So they lost their 60 votes.

So they decided instead of combining the two bills ( from house and senate), house would pass the senate bill. They would need to re vote only if the original bills had changed.

So House once more voted on health care reform ( The senate bill did not change, so they did not need to vote on it ).

However many people in the house side were unhappy with some of the stuff in the senate version. So they used the method you are referring to which is called Budget reconciliation to fix it.


To answer your question as why they can not do the same thing for CIR?
The Budget reconciliation only deals with budget issues. Budget reconciliation allows the budget related issues ( only budget) to be passed by the 51 ( 50+1) votes.

They can not use it to pass policies that are not related to budget.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#14
07-02-2010, 12:24 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
1,932 posts
Feenmi's Avatar
Feenmi
Feenmi
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Feenmi
Find all posts by Feenmi
290 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrlandoDREAM Act View Post
and that is lugar.
For DA, yes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dtrt09 View Post
Corrections for all of the above:
1-The Democrats have 58 *members* in the Senate ,as I'm sure ALL of you know by now, Sen. Byrd passed away.
2-Not all Democrats support CIR on its face and need to be cajoled by leadership to vote "yes".
3-Insurance reform (aka, "health" reform) was passed thru reconciliation. See trickery abounds in law-making if you're really, really interested in making it happen.

And this last point is why Obama says he needs a handful of Republican votes, not just the two needed to make 60, and is the reason he mentioned the "11" Republicans who voted "yes" in 2007.
You are correct sir. I forgot Senator Byrd's passing. And you are also correct on not all Dems supporting CIR. I was just proving a point (without getting into too much detail) to dado that Republican support IS needed and CIR cannot be passed by Dems alone.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#15
07-02-2010, 01:24 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,652 posts
dado123
dado123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dado123
Find all posts by dado123
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluestar View Post
Well this is i think what happened in the case of health care reform ( correct if i am wrong ).

Senate passed their version of the bill with 60 votes. House also passed their version with majority votes.

Then the bills went to be merged and compromised. But Brown won the senate race. So they lost their 60 votes.

So they decided instead of combining the two bills ( from house and senate), house would pass the senate bill. They would need to re vote only if the original bills had
changed; bottom line, there effort concentrated to CIR is significantly less than that of Health care, regardless of which means used.

So House once more voted on health care reform ( The senate bill did not change, so they did not need to vote on it ).

However many people in the house side were unhappy with some of the stuff in the senate version. So they used the method you are referring to which is called Budget reconciliation to fix it.


To answer your question as why they can not do the same thing for CIR?
The Budget reconciliation only deals with budget issues. Budget reconciliation allows the budget related issues ( only budget) to be passed by the 51 ( 50+1) votes.

They can not use it to pass policies that are not related to budget.
Am burned, I am getting it from somewhere reconciliation was engaged thorough out the legislative process, to enact this bill; bottom line the effort concentrated into CIR is significantly less than Health Care reform, regardless of which means used.
Last edited by dado123; 07-02-2010 at 01:38 AM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#16
07-06-2010, 07:07 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
412 posts
Invictus
Invictus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Invictus
Find all posts by Invictus
20 AP
Just something I felt had to be emphasized about Obama's responsibility for CIR/DA

12:33 onwards, the question from Alberto, recited by the Univision representative.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.